First of all you shoot in the DNG-format. It gives almost an extra stop of dynamic range.
The format is also much better for more extreme editing like lightening up the deep shadows of your foreground.
For this type of HDR subjects you need to make at least two exposures/images. One exposed for...
It is nice to see the differences between your image and footage.
The smoothing (woolliness) happens in the low contrast-area's. In high contrast transitions the details are still preserved.
These are the artifacts of H.264 processing.
I corrected the WB to neutral but that might be to cold. It is always a matter of taste and esthetics.
The neutral point for me was color of the asphalt on that little road.
I didn't correct for chromatic aberration and I don't see a lot of purple CA.
If I correct your images in camera raw for CA I can't see any differences.
Are you sure it is CA or are the just colors.
My corrections on 0001.DNG
Do you have the Dng-files of these images. I'm very curious about the 'raw' quality of the 'Path image' in the woods. It now has somewhat a paintery look.
Nice dog by the way.:)
It might change the appearance of the preview, which is a jpg-file, on your phone/tablet. The raw-file itself has not changed because of its very essence.
Your picture is an other story then the video. The softness on the right of the image looks like lens-softness/error. I have this also a little bit with my P3P.
In that case I need to see the stills. Do you shoot in DNG?
Camera/lenssoftness looks completely different. In your video I see very bad processing errors. It is not soft, it is unusable
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.