Question, so if I am in an area that has a LAANC requirement with 200 feet max ceiling but I am able to go up a 5 story parking garage.. Does this man i can fly 200 feet above the parking garage top?
Thanks,
Venom
Thanks,
Venom
Actually I'm asking for a specific reason and a specific task and yes it's in the vicinity of a air port but if LAANC approves I want to know the interpretation of the law and would I be within legal right.that sort of height restriction probably means that there will be other aircraft flying below the normal minimums for safe flight ,maybe the glide path to an airport or close to a helipad so would you want to fly above the 200 ft agl height that is in operation i think you already know the answer
I welcolm your opinion, let's see what others say and I'm glad it's not as cut and dry yet loli would think that irrespective of what height you took of from then the 200 ft AGL limit would still apply ,thats my interpretation of it ,but not being in the States i could be wrong but to me an altitude limit, is an altitude limit full stop.
Yes. If you calibrate your compass when standing on a mountain 3km high then 3km would be 0m.I welcolm your opinion, let's see what others say and I'm glad it's not as cut and dry yet lol
Yes but he asked about on top of a building - see post #7Yes. If you calibrate your compass when standing on a mountain 3km high then 3km would be 0m.
The altitude limits in LAANC are above ground heights so you drone cant fly over 200 ft from the surface of the ground. If you fly over a hill you can still 200 ft above the hill. Your location is meaningless though. It’s the drones location that mattersQuestion, so if I am in an area that has a LAANC requirement with 200 feet max ceiling but I am able to go up a 5 story parking garage.. Does this man i can fly 200 feet above the parking garage top?
Thanks,
Venom
From THIS (Drone Launch Academy) this may help you
Practice Questions about MSL and AGL
Understanding the difference between AGL and MSL is also important if you want to obtain a remote pilot certificate from the FAA.
To receive this certificate, you must first pass the FAA’s remote pilot exam, which is commonly referred to as the Part 107 Test.
Below, we’ve provided you with a couple of sample questions (along with explanations about why each answer option is correct or incorrect) so that you can test yourself to see if you truly understand the difference between MSL vs. AGL.
Question 1: You climb up 13 flights of stairs to the roof of your apartment building, which is approximately 130 ft. tall. What can you know for sure?
A: You are at 130 ft. AGL
B: You are at 130 ft. MSL
C: You are at both 130 ft. AGL and MSL
D: You are at neither 130 ft. AGL or MSL
If you guessed A, you’re right! You know for certain that you are 130 ft. AGL because you are 130 ft. above the ground below you. Answer B and C are incorrect because you do not know for certain if you are 130 ft. MSL because you did not receive information about how high above mean sea level the land that the apartment building is located on is. D is also incorrect because you can know for sure that you at least one part is true—that you are 130 ft AGL.
Outside of Controlled Airspace, the 400' rule does come into play. Say you're flying within 400' of a 1600' antenna. As long as you stay within 400' of the tower, you can fly up to 2000'. (107.51 b1 & 2)
Your compass measures direction.Yes. If you calibrate your compass when standing on a mountain 3km high then 3km would be 0m.
Just want to clarify that the 400' rule only benefits Part 107 pilots. Recreational pilots have a strict 400 foot AGL limit and are not allowed to fly higher than that even if they are next to a structure.
I welcolm your opinion, let's see what others say and I'm glad it's not as cut and dry yet lol
It is now, not at the time of that post.. hence the "yet".It's completely cut and dried - the LAANC altitude limits are clearly defined as AGL, not above launch elevation.
It was ALWAYS clear and without any ambiguity, either now or at time of post.It is now, not at the time of that post.. hence the "yet".