DJI Mavic, Air and Mini Drones
Friendly, Helpful & Knowledgeable Community
Join Us Now

Help me understand "fractional" sensor size

vindibona1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
3,977
Reactions
3,961
Location
Democratic Peoples Republic of Crook County
Math isn't my strong suit and I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the censor size notations in fractional inches with decimals. In this case it would be much clearer if done in millimeters. But it is what it is. And why do non US companies use inches anyway?

I was comparing the sensor in the Mini 2 vs the Autel Nano Plus. The Nano plus has a1/1.28 Inch CMOS Sensor while the Mini 2 has a 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor. The Nano's (non Plus) censor has a more straight forward listing of 1/2", which is easily understood. What's with the fractions after the slash (division mark) with a Mini 2 or Nano Plus? How is that calculated? While we're at it, explain how 4/3rds censors are calculated for area. TIA

Please help unconfuse me?
 
Please help unconfuse me?
That might not be possible as the names for sensor sizes are very confusing and don't refer to any of the dimensions of the sensor.

This explains how the names were derived:

There is a large table with actual sensor dimensions at the bottom of this article:
 
Everyone measures it in inches because that's what everyone is accustomed to.

Fractions is division: 1/2 = 1 ÷ 2 = 0.5

The number in front of slash dividend, and the number after the slash is divisor.
The higher the dividend is, the higher the resulting number.
The higher the divisor is, the smaller the resulting number.

1/1.28 = 1 ÷ 1.28 = 0.78125
1/2.3 = 1 ÷ 2.3 = 0.43478
4/3 = 4 ÷ 3 = 1.33333

The resulting number is the diagonal of the sensor in inches

EDIT:
Ah, so to get to correct answer you always have to multiply the whole division by another 0.63

4/3 inch sensor then 1.3333 -> 1.3333 * 0.63 = 0.8399 actual diagonal inches

As "sar104" noted: That is approximately correct for most sensor sizes.
 
Last edited:
Everyone measures it in inches because that's what everyone is accustomed to.

Fractions is division: 1/2 = 1 ÷ 2 = 0.5

The number in front of slash dividend, and the number after the slash is divisor.
The higher the dividend is, the higher the resulting number.
The higher the divisor is, the smaller the resulting number.

1/1.28 = 1 ÷ 1.28 = 0.78125
1/2.3 = 1 ÷ 2.3 = 0.43478
4/3 = 4 ÷ 3 = 1.33333

The resulting number is the diagonal of the sensor in inches
There is somewhat clarifying. The question came up in my mind as I was comparing the new Autel nano plus versus the DJI mini 2.
 
1/(the smaller this number is the bigger the sensor). This is only helpful to compare size these numbers don’t equate to anything meaningful

Everyone measures it in inches because that's what everyone is accustomed to.

Fractions is division: 1/2 = 1 ÷ 2 = 0.5

The number in front of slash dividend, and the number after the slash is divisor.
The higher the dividend is, the higher the resulting number.
The higher the divisor is, the smaller the resulting number.

1/1.28 = 1 ÷ 1.28 = 0.78125
1/2.3 = 1 ÷ 2.3 = 0.43478
4/3 = 4 ÷ 3 = 1.33333

The resulting number is the diagonal of the sensor in inches
It’s easy to see why people think that but that isn’t true. A 1” sensor has a 16mm diagonal ie ~0.63 inches.

The name 1” sensor is short for 1 inch tube equivalent digital sensor. It doesn’t have anything meaningful to do with the inches that are on a ruler 📏
 
1/(the smaller this number is the bigger the sensor). This is only helpful to compare size these numbers don’t equate to anything meaningful


It’s easy to see why people think that but that isn’t true. A 1” sensor has a 16mm diagonal ie ~0.63 inches.

The name 1” sensor is short for 1 inch tube equivalent digital sensor. It doesn’t have anything meaningful to do with the inches that are on a ruler 📏
Ah, so to get to correct answer you always have to multiply the whole division by another 0.63?
Is the following correct?

4/3 inch sensor then 1.3333 -> 1.3333 * 0.63 = 0.8399 actual diagonal inches

Does it apply the same way for any sensor size?
 
Ah, so to get to correct answer you always have to multiply the whole division by another 0.63?
Is the following correct?

4/3 inch sensor then 1.3333 -> 1.3333 * 0.63 = 0.8399 actual diagonal inches

Does it apply the same way for any sensor size?
That is approximately correct for most sensor sizes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaximusCZ
Everyone measures it in inches because that's what everyone is accustomed to.

Fractions is division: 1/2 = 1 ÷ 2 = 0.5

The number in front of slash dividend, and the number after the slash is divisor.
The higher the dividend is, the higher the resulting number.
The higher the divisor is, the smaller the resulting number.

1/1.28 = 1 ÷ 1.28 = 0.78125
1/2.3 = 1 ÷ 2.3 = 0.43478
4/3 = 4 ÷ 3 = 1.33333

The resulting number is the diagonal of the sensor in inches

EDIT:
Ah, so to get to correct answer you always have to multiply the whole division by another 0.63

4/3 inch sensor then 1.3333 -> 1.3333 * 0.63 = 0.8399 actual diagonal inches

As "sar104" noted: That is approximately correct for most sensor sizes.
Well defined. Well said.
 
This is how Wendy's shelved the 1/3 pound burger because people actually thought Mc Donald's 1/4 pound burger was bigger. :rolleyes:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ackdrone
Lycus Tech Mavic Air 3 Case

DJI Drone Deals

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
130,600
Messages
1,554,278
Members
159,607
Latest member
Schmidteh121