Welcome Mavic Pilot!
Jump in and join our free DJI Mavic community today!
Sign up

Mavic Pro vs air portability in there bags?

Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6
Likes
0
Age
31
#1
Is the Mavic Air that much more portable then the pro when they are both in ther fly more combo bags with batteries and controllers etc as to me they seem about the same ?
 

Just_nick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
640
Likes
426
#2
Is the Mavic Air that much more portable then the pro when they are both in ther fly more combo bags with batteries and controllers etc as to me they seem about the same ?
No, it's insignificantly different when they're in the bags, which is why portability really isn't a pro for the Mavic Air. The size difference between drones seems great until you pack everything and realize that there's almost no difference.
 
Likes: drone_video
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6
Likes
0
Age
31
#3
Thanks for the quick reply I am a pro owner and the only reason I was thinking about switching to the air was the portability of it but I couldn’t find any comparison videos showing the size difference between the two when there both packed away in ther bags I will defo be keeping the pro now tho thanks
 

Mavflyer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2018
Messages
434
Likes
261
#4
Thanks for the quick reply I am a pro owner and the only reason I was thinking about switching to the air was the portability of it but I couldn’t find any comparison videos showing the size difference between the two when there both packed away in ther bags I will defo be keeping the pro now tho thanks
You have the Mavic Pro fly more and you want something more portable than that?

Here ya go!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071RRMGWW/ref=twister_B07C78QW8V?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

Just kidding....but you aren't going to find something of the caliber of the Mavic Pro, that is more portable
 
Likes: Chahk

drone_video

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Messages
149
Likes
101
Age
44
#5
Is the Mavic Air that much more portable then the pro when they are both in ther fly more combo bags with batteries and controllers etc as to me they seem about the same ?
I have both the Mavic Pro and the Mavic Air. I can affirm that the size difference when they are packed is not worth noting. The Mavic Air however has a significantly better gimbal, and gimbal guard that's more durable for transporting. If you don't already have a drone, and it may be worth waiting until Mavic Pro II comes out and see what that's like. If you had to get one now, I like the Mavic Air for its durability on the Gimbal over the Mavic Pro. There is almost no difference in the camera, but if you look at these videos it shows off the difference really well:


Lots of details to consider. good luck with your choice.
 

tiparoch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
136
Likes
31
Age
56
#6
If you are comparing the supplied bags, l actually think the M Air is more portable. If you are looking for sheer portability M Air for sure. It comes with a hard case that the bird and a phone fit into. I found a hard phone case that works for the r controller. So put those in each jacket pocket as you scale your mountain or ride your bike or. . .l have both MPro and Air. I like both but the M Air Literally fits in pockets.
 

Lykus

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
38
Likes
10
Location
Irvine, CA
Website
www.lykustech.com
#8
MA's bag in the fly more combo has a new and different design than MP's bag. As a result, MA's bag can fit everything in the combo and has a better structure whereas MP's bag can only store a portion of the combo items. Also, MA's fly more combo gives you a case for the drone and controller, which I think is pretty convenient for quick and short flights.
 
Likes: tiparoch

Kilrah

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
4,384
Likes
2,103
Age
36
Location
Switzerland
#9
There isn't a big difference with the supplied bags, but there is if you consider efficient and comparable packing. For a start the MA bag packs 3 batteries, the charger and charging hub, while the MP bag doesn't pack the charger or hub.

Assuming you take no charger and 3 batteries the MP comes at about 3x the weight of the MA. You can take the MA in its little hard case with 2 additional batteries in the pouch and throw the controller next to it and have something less than half the volume of the MP equivalent.
 

tiparoch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
136
Likes
31
Age
56
#10
There isn't a big difference with the supplied bags, but there is if you consider efficient and comparable packing. For a start the MA bag packs 3 batteries, the charger and charging hub, while the MP bag doesn't pack the charger or hub.

Assuming you take no charger and 3 batteries the MP comes at about 3x the weight of the MA. You can take the MA in its little hard case with 2 additional batteries in the pouch and throw the controller next to it and have something less than half the volume of the MP equivalent.
YUP!
 

Lake_Flyer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2017
Messages
1,136
Likes
589
Age
61
#11
But on a day trip total flying time matters as well, for some even more than size and weight. The Pro has quite a lot more flying time than the air with 3 batteries, effectively 20 minutes.
 

tiparoch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
136
Likes
31
Age
56
#12
True, true. But.... on that day trip, if I were squeezing into a tight spot, or up into a knarly place where every milimetre counted... the M Air is nice.
 

Kilrah

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
4,384
Likes
2,103
Age
36
Location
Switzerland
#13
If I intend to fly for sure or go to a place with that as one of the main purposes I take the Pro. But the "throw the Air at the bottom of the bag just in case" scenario happens to be much more common for me. Not wasting space/weight for all the times it doesn't get taken out, but have something good enough if it ends up flying.
 

swooshdave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Messages
452
Likes
257
Location
Portland, Oregon
Website
www.youtube.com
#14
No, it's insignificantly different when they're in the bags, which is why portability really isn't a pro for the Mavic Air. The size difference between drones seems great until you pack everything and realize that there's almost no difference.
Some other Pro owner spouted the same nonsense. It's completely wrong.
 

Dave A

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2018
Messages
115
Likes
109
Location
Ontario
#15
The size difference would be insignificant for 90% of people. If you want to carry a drone around in your pocket get the MA. Otherwise get the one who's features best suit what you are looking for. But if you get the MA be ready to be constantly asked, " Is that a drone in your pocket or are you just happy to see me." :p
 
Likes: Pedro

CanadaDrone

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
484
Likes
278
#18
I tried both before buying the Air and at least for me there was a significant difference. Everyone's tolerances and thresholds will be different anytime you discuss size/weight, but the Air is objectively smaller and lighter.

A big thing for me was that I can store the Air in it's hard case and still have it be smaller than the Pro unprotected and without a case. I feel better when it is in a dedicated hard case, but that's just me.

On the weight side:

Pro w/battery: 743g
2 extra batteries: 580g (240g ea)
Remote: Can't find this but I will assume it's more than the Air due to the LCD.
Total: 1.32Kg + Remote

Air w/battery: 430g
2 Extra Batteries: 280g (140g ea)
Remote: Assume less than the MP due to lack of LCD
Total: 710g + Remote

The MP "gone flying" kit is almost double the weight before remote (~86% heavier). That is quite significant, especially if your'e a hiker or trying to stay within carry-on weight limits. If you are a minimalist traveler (drone w/1 battery, remote), the size difference is easily enough to be the difference between a coat pocket or a dedicated bag, but there are going to be varying opinions there.

Folded, the MA's volume is 50% of the MP.

The removable remote sticks on the MA make a big difference to how you can pack it - I can tuck it in a slim compartment and not worry about it rather than having to carry it in a separate case to protect the sticks.

The MA can fit all of it's accessories, chargers, and batteries in the included travel bag. I can also fit the MA (inside hard case), 3 batteries, remote, and smaller accessories in a bag as small as the Peak Design Everyday Sling 5L. The MP fits in this bag also, but unprotected and with less room. I would not be able to carry everything I want to carry in the same way if I had a MP.

The MA gimbal design is more robust, and the folding design is better IMO.

The MA may also be seen as less intimidating to bystanders/authorities because it's smaller, but that is a guess.

All just my $0.02, it's nice to have options and both are fantastic drones, far more portable than something like a Phantom :)
 

Skiergd011013

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
125
Likes
69
Age
29
Location
Massachusetts
#19
The MA may also be seen as less intimidating to bystanders/authorities because it's smaller, but that is a guess.
until you power it on and they hear it. My friend said it best. He said my pro at 50 feet sounds like his air at 300 feet. His air is now for sale in western ma if anybody wants it:D
 

MavicMo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Messages
338
Likes
249
#20
I'm with the majority of the people on this thread. The size difference is insignificant. But what you give up in the Pro vs the Air is far more (I've got both). You can't simply compare the size of the drone, You need to add in ALL the gear you bring with you, the remote, batteries, tablet, mavmount (if you use one), etc. That all takes up space. How much space does all that take up.

I also feel you give up too much with the Mavic Air; it's loud, it's range is poor, video gets laggy at short ranges, and it has a much shorter flight time. And IMO, the MA feels cheap compared to the MP.

People say the MP's camera is inferior and the gimbal is fragile. Uploading videos and pics to Youtube or whatever social media sharing site, you're hard pressed to tell the difference. And the gimbal being fragile? I don't think so. If you are talking a crash. Well all bets are off. Anything can happen, but in general the gimbal on the MP is pretty darn good. As an example, I ride and ADV bike which takes me off-road. I ride all kinds of terrain. By the middle of summer, a lot of the roads I ride are "washboard" covered and can be like that for miles. One time I had my MP with me and the gimbal lock had fallen off. The trail was particularly bad. When I found a spot I wanted to film/shoot, my wrists and quads were beat. It was like riding on a jack hammer. When I pulled out my MP, the gimbal lock and camera cover were loose in the case. Somewhere on the ride they'd come off. I was a bit concerned, but I fired it up and everything worked fine. IMO, a testament to the durability of the gimbal.
 

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
47,670
Messages
557,115
Members
70,524
Latest member
RysiekBB