The second photo is exceedingly better then the first one
In your opinion- likely not only and certainly not exclusively.
www.sun-sentinel.com
It depends what you are looking for. I prefer both wide angle shots to the "closeup" ones. Way more interesting and colorful.
Sufficient altitude and within range of a body of water and the float plane will fare better- no question.
Any problem, if any, is most likely show itself early on when ran hard. This is true for most any electronic device.
GIVE NEW PC TOUGH TESTS IN FIRST MONTH
One of the most closely guarded secrets in the personal-computing world is the annual rate of return for defective merchandise _ lemons so flawed that all of the technical support calls in the worl…
Back when I was a quality assurance engineer, our rule of thumb was that 99.9% of failures in electronic equipment would occur in the first 1000 hours of operation. We subjected our products to an accelerated ~250 hour burn-in test with power and temperature cycling to ferret out those early failures. Typical failure rates during that burn-in test was ~3%. Commercial mfgs are happy to ship products without that stringent test regime and accept the failure rate. You can call that "Customer burn-in test" ;-)
Excellent! I'd like to do the same in the near future. The zoom results speak for themselves.(from the shot it looks like you are just one inlet over from me)
