Agree. I don't get the immediate need (or support of) to resort to violence to resolve these types of issues or to call people "stupid" or "be a man". Maybe the guy on the beach was taking pictures of something else and the camera was pointed in that direction, like the OP could have been doing...
The premise of the thread changed about post #19. The question about the weight was moot, depends on the strength (resistance) of the surface area it impacts on. Airframes are tested to withstand certain impacts at cruising speeds, see link in earlier post.
I don't think anyone denies that there would be damage and disruption. I thought the discussion was around the ability of a UAV strike to bring a large commercial aircraft down? The attached is fact based (NTSB), not just an opinion, backed up by a bunch of other data point points. As of yet...
Don't get me wrong, I am not doubting damage , just looking at the likelihood of it happening and then the safety measures built into the a/c that could then result in a loss. Quick web search shows that airframes are designed to take a 4lb impact while tail sections 8lbs. See this link...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.