OK off topic so might get removed but basic summary.
(i) im a photographer
(ii) i make money from photos
(iii) im a drone operator
(iv) i like the outdoors
To address that, NT has a policy of no commercial photography on their lands (note not just properties the lands in total). Although this seems relatively innocuous in practice NT has slowly been buying up vast areas of the UK countryside and coastline. They "own" a sizeable percentage of the UKs rural areas and its growing all the time.
See here for example:-
Follow the history of our places with Land Map
What these 2 things mean in practice is NT claim its illegal for any commercial photography even of completely unimproved natural landscapes. Want to take a commercial photo of the mountains here in Wales? In theory No because the land is all NT for miles around.
Want to take a picture of the millions of years old White Cliffs of Dover? Sorry nope, thats NT land.
Want to photograph some amazing natural coastline on a walk? Nope. NT have that too.
What about this huge, empty golden sandy beach? Dream on. NT land.
Some nice images of the Lake District national park? Umm No.
This is the organisation that a few years ago (i) tried to get all images of things like the above removed from stock agency sites and who threatened to sue people uploading photos of Whitby Abby on Flickr (photos from public land, for non commercial use and where the Abby was in the background not even the main image). They were made to back down there but it highlights the mentality.
In addition to that their attitude towards drone users is dishonest. As well as banning operation from those huge areas of the UK above (even if no people literally within miles) they also misleading claim *overflight* is not allowed and that byelaws forbid it.
I went to the effort of finding and then verifying the list of byelaws and they contain no such provision (which likely would not be legal even if it did) yet they still openly claim overflight is not permitted on websites - something they have no authority to ban (so keeping it on topic!).
On paper they're a registered charity, in reality they're a profit making business that has provisions to create its own byelaws and is slowly taking over.
Add to that their car park hobby where they takeover a previous free or cheap car park (or field) and up the price massively and pile in the cash. Nobody is against paying some money for upkeep but they go far beyond that.
Note here im NOT referring to the NT properties and buildings/houses which i agree should not be allowed commercial operations, do cost money for upkeep and so on. That to me would be acceptable. Im referring to the huge natural landscapes of the UK which have been around thousands of years which suddenly now are banned from commercial photography, drones and everything else. They've taken a policy to crazy extremes.
If you don't do any commercial photography, ever sell a photo and don't own a drone then chances are the above wont bother you. But for those of us that do, its a big issue.