Hey, they could charge admission. Pier Excursions®That pier takes off and moves to a different spot if the fish aren't biting there![]()
Hey, they could charge admission. Pier Excursions®That pier takes off and moves to a different spot if the fish aren't biting there![]()
and given the chop. Ohh dear lol.I think the kid was judged by a jury of his piers.
There's no minimum age to take the TRUST test. That's a bit uncomfortable. But then again, there are a lot of childish adults flying drones and the overall safety record is still very good.I thought that minimum age to fly was 16...
too bad such a young kid is going to be in so much trouble, when fully grown adults do stuff like this and don't get caught.
good callThat’s an awful piece of spelling![]()
Agreed. Those are teenagers being teenagers and even with those kind of [serious] charges, my guess is hours of community service will be the outcome based on a plea where they'll resort to picking up at and cleaning the beaches for the entire summer. I can see the DA doing the calculations, two days a week, 13 weeks of summer......200 hours.If they can afford that boat (oh, and that house), one would think they could afford the trash pick-up service...
The nice thing about the Phantoms was the landing gear, which functioned better as catch handles than landing gear. The negative thing was the fixed prop blades were unforgiving.With a phantom and a leg catch it tends to be the thumb that is at risk.
You're asking a lot hereFrom the opening sentence of the news article, ".... was injured by the propeller blades of a fishing pier in".....
Blimey, the pier must have some motors.
I do wish news organisations would proof read their copy
Agreed and it hurt lol but my I dare say that a strike from a grown up magic prop would hurt too.The negative thing was the fixed prop blades were unforgiving.