I sincerely hope that what I have seen on Youtube is a Youtube 5k compression issue.
I have now viewed 3 comparison videos and every comparison to the Mavic 2 Pro, the Mavic 2 Pro wins. IMHO
The Cine 3 looks to be very mushy and lacking in detail.
One video that I saw, the Youtuber was using an Nd16, on auto settings and the footage still seemed to be washed out in the whites and grey in the darks.
I will say that when the Youtuber got close to an object and stopped moving the drone, the image looked great!
To be grabbing 3760mbs in ProRes 422, this Mavic 3 should be able to capture amazing detail with out having to sit still.
The Mavic 2 Pro only shoots in 100mbs and that unit grabs very good detail to me.
I hope that this is a Yoube thing.
I have now viewed 3 comparison videos and every comparison to the Mavic 2 Pro, the Mavic 2 Pro wins. IMHO
The Cine 3 looks to be very mushy and lacking in detail.
One video that I saw, the Youtuber was using an Nd16, on auto settings and the footage still seemed to be washed out in the whites and grey in the darks.
I will say that when the Youtuber got close to an object and stopped moving the drone, the image looked great!
To be grabbing 3760mbs in ProRes 422, this Mavic 3 should be able to capture amazing detail with out having to sit still.
The Mavic 2 Pro only shoots in 100mbs and that unit grabs very good detail to me.
I hope that this is a Yoube thing.