AlanTheBeast
Well-Known Member
I am really on the fence about this. I suspect a 10 minute flight time,
Mass/Wh suggests 16 minutes max. And that's what DJI claim too.
I am really on the fence about this. I suspect a 10 minute flight time,
Sure, but likely 10 before if starts beeping at you.Mass/Wh suggests 16 minutes max. And that's what DJI claim too.
Sure, but likely 10 before if starts beeping at you.
I agree about the fact that it does not have foldable arms like the Mavic. That would have made it 100% as far as Im concerned. I think most of us here are gadget geeks too, so youre not alone.
This is why I got one. We're constantly crashing our Mavics and I feel like the Spark will hold up better / be a good backup on a shoot in case both Mavics are broken.
I won't be getting one because no folding arms and the crippled EU range. It's also missing DNG output which is kind of a big deal.
Just trying to get an idea of how many of us are going to get one. I intend to have a few (dozen) for spare parts purposes. This poll may be a little bit premature, but if the Spark lives up to your expectations, would you sell you Mav and keep the Spark?
def spark for Europe travel, esp milan and venice. I tried mavic and it caused some attention, had to talk with patrol officersFor traveling overseas, say Europe, would you recommend a spark or a mavic?
Mavic - The Spark looks amazing but I would buy the Mavic Pro Fly More again if faced with the decison of choosing between the two. IMO the Mavic is a fully capable bird along the same line as the Phantom series. It is much more portable though with the tradeoff being a little image quality. The Spark is not the same. It is limited in a number of ways and is intended for a different audience. This is not to say that it better or worse... just different.But if any if you had to choose between the mavic or spark....which one?