AlanTheBeast
Well-Known Member
I am really on the fence about this. I suspect a 10 minute flight time,
Mass/Wh suggests 16 minutes max. And that's what DJI claim too.
I am really on the fence about this. I suspect a 10 minute flight time,
Sure, but likely 10 before if starts beeping at you.Mass/Wh suggests 16 minutes max. And that's what DJI claim too.
Sure, but likely 10 before if starts beeping at you.
I agree about the fact that it does not have foldable arms like the Mavic. That would have made it 100% as far as Im concerned. I think most of us here are gadget geeks too, so youre not alone.
This is why I got one. We're constantly crashing our Mavics and I feel like the Spark will hold up better / be a good backup on a shoot in case both Mavics are broken.
I won't be getting one because no folding arms and the crippled EU range. It's also missing DNG output which is kind of a big deal.
Just trying to get an idea of how many of us are going to get one. I intend to have a few (dozen) for spare parts purposes. This poll may be a little bit premature, but if the Spark lives up to your expectations, would you sell you Mav and keep the Spark?
def spark for Europe travel, esp milan and venice. I tried mavic and it caused some attention, had to talk with patrol officersFor traveling overseas, say Europe, would you recommend a spark or a mavic?
Mavic - The Spark looks amazing but I would buy the Mavic Pro Fly More again if faced with the decison of choosing between the two. IMO the Mavic is a fully capable bird along the same line as the Phantom series. It is much more portable though with the tradeoff being a little image quality. The Spark is not the same. It is limited in a number of ways and is intended for a different audience. This is not to say that it better or worse... just different.But if any if you had to choose between the mavic or spark....which one?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.