Recent content by Filmarik

I would say in most situations close to zero. Just look at all the beautiful cinematic landscape videos done with M4P recently!! I believe all without ND filters. I fell for the hype of ND filters and 180 deg rule too. But TBH unless you shoot for a very fastidious Holywood director you'd be...

M4P has cluster of electrical contacts behind the existing clear glass filter attachement it currently sells with. That indicates that the drone is at least hardware ready for the eND. So to answer your question, yes it should work.

LOL Reporting back as promissed: After experiencing long satellite acquisition time in my home after updating to FlyApp 17 I decided to roll back the FlyApp to v.13.9. on my Rc Pro. Bench tested after the roll back at home on the same spot several times with the same result. 0 satellites for...

From what I've read and seen so far and despite my criticism of some aspects of IQ (nitpicking to most..) I reckon that M4P chould be a valuable addition to your photo gear. Stitching in vertical mode even if just 3 shots in 25MP mode would provide you with resolution closer to what you are used...

Golden reason, LOL...

And how is the rotatable screen going to help here?? It helps only with the visibility of the screen but you would still need to hold the controller in an awkward position - perpendicular to the ground so that the antennas are facing the sky.

It is shame that the antennas can not be tilted upwards. When the drone is directly overhead you might need to hold the controller in very uncomforable position to get the flat parts of the antennas to face the drone as per the instructions🫤

I agree with all your observations. The point #7. about Retina display on MacBook Pro you are are 100% spot on🙂. Everything looks so sharp at 100%. I use for my day to day work PC with Eizo 24" display with 1920x1200 resolution and it represents the sharpness of photos more realistically at...

Better corner sharpness in M4P 28mm photos should not come as a big surprise. After all this is narrower 28mm lens projecting image on cropped 4/3 sensor to 3:2 ratio. If you cropped your M3 Classic shots to 3:2 ratio by chopping top and bottom of the frame, the corners will look significantly...

Not many digital photos even from FF DSLR look all that great at 200%. Realistically noone is going to be looking at photos with magnifying glass. But I understand what you are trying to convey, how weird the fine detail looks in photos taken with QB sensor.

In News section there is a guy PanoVolo who is not very happy with M4P photos by the sound of it. So many conflicting reports...

The QA problems with lenses persisted throughout the entire production period of Mavic 3 series so what I see here is worrisome. The CA resembling issue around the crosses is related to QB sensor, I believe. The color is bleeding through sharp edges of high contrast and it resembles optical CA...

I only downloaded and processed in Lr the very first shot of the Tallinn Old Town, the 25MP version. While it looks pretty good on the first sight upon closer scrutiny at 100% on my monitor the first thing I've noticed was the blurry zone on right side of the frame where the white church tower...

LOL...

Have you tried up-resing using the Enhanced - Super Resolution in Lr? It renders photos 10500x7900px from the M3P Hassy camera after first processed in DxO PureRaw, and they look pretty good even when printed large