Recent content by Glomby

The problem is, it only uses a 4K area of the sensor but due to the way CMOS sensors work that doesn't mean you get 4K resolution. You actually need more than that to get true 4K resolution. That's why the P4P uses the whole 5,7K sensor and still doesn't get true 4K resolution, but it's very...

I wouldn't say the expectations were too high and it makes sense from a marketing standpoint. The expectations align perfectly with what the M2P is supposed to be. It rings the same kind of bells the P4P did. 1" sensor, 4k and it goes even further with 10bit and the Hasselblad name. The reason...

So they are basically never properly down sampling (down scaling), it's always some kind of line skipping or pixel binning and therefor an artefact introducing compromise. I don't see how this makes sense with such a sensor and the processing power on board. I really hope they can fix a lot of this.

So just to be clear. In HQ mode the sensor is properly used (no binning, line skipping) and it also uses the true amount of pixels needed to fill up a 4k image, but due to the debayering effect it loses resolution. The P4P however uses the whole 5.5K sensor and properly down samples to achieve a...