High_Order1's latest activity
-
High_Order1 replied to the thread US FAA regulation reference minimum height.Yeah, I'm familiar with aerial curtilage, but the concept of a 'taking' is new to me. Apparently, there is civil case law on the idea of nuisance aircraft related to fields, I guess that's where that piece of legislation originated. I haven't... -
High_Order1 replied to the thread We Ask Again: Where Were the Drones?.From an executive protection standpoint, UAV's would be, in a limited scope of application, be absolutely a great thing, irrespective of their political leanings. The matrix looks more at how likely they are to upset someone enough to get off...
-
High_Order1 replied to the thread Rec flier questions (research done).Is it possible you saw that in the rules of the org you planned to fly under?
-
High_Order1 posted the thread US FAA regulation reference minimum height in sUAV Rules & Regulations.I'm reviewing my state's laws again (Tennessee) Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-405 Criminal Trespass (d) For purposes of this section, “enter” means intrusion of the entire body or when a person causes an unmanned aircraft to enter that portion of the...
-
High_Order1 replied to the thread We Ask Again: Where Were the Drones?.except for there are few, if any private security companies with police powers if you are getting paid to be there, you ain't recreating and, in my state, there is a lot of legislation regulating drones.