MARK (LI)'s latest activity
-
It's even simpler than that. There is a TFR in place; the drone shouldn't have been there at all. -
There was a collision. The manned aircraft had the right of way. The drone was obligated to give way. No logic or courtroom cleverness could prevail over those hard facts.
-
And a responsible pilot shouldn't require a TFR to know that it was entirely wrong and dangerous to be flying in that area with search and rescue operations in progress and people's lives hanging in the balance.
-
MARK (LI) reacted to Droning on and on...'s post in the thread "bound or unbound" that is the question. with
Like.
Well, I disagree. I think it a pretty effective anti-theft feature that does actually reduce theft, especially for the more expensive models. MHO -
Why go looking for trouble? I am a risk averse drone pilot and I cherish even my Mavic mini 4pro let alone my Mavic3. I like freedom from police and lawyers and against fines too much. That footage is not worth risking it all for me. Dale