This is good point. During oral argument in Brennan v Dickson, DC federal appellate Judge Robert Wilkins made it clear he thought it was absurd to force hobby drone flyers to broadcast their locations when flying on private property away from...
By operating a drone with RID, you have already given consent for your information to be broadcast.
The decision in Brennon v. Dickson ruled that RID does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
The court stated that flying a drone in open air is a...
Again, I'm fine with the government having RID and just like with license plates, simply broadcasting is not a 4th amendment violation (like the other examples I mentioned, not RID) but when the government goes to use it, we'll see. I don't...