Welcome Mavic Pilot!
Jump in and join our free DJI Mavic community today!
Sign up

sar104's latest activity

  • sar104
    sar104 reacted to BudWalker's post in the thread Mavic Mini Lost in the Ocean with Like Like.
    It's been a while and you probably forgot that the motorCurrent data is only partially correct. In particular, the leftFront always...
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Mavic Mini Lost in the Ocean.
    I had forgotten. Was there any conclusion on whether the current data are still approximately correct? They look reasonable, apart from...
  • sar104
    sar104 reacted to BudWalker's post in the thread Get the wind data from Mavic 2 Zoom? with Like Like.
    You've managed to uncover a design flaw that's existed since day one. It's never been a problem until now and will be a major...
  • sar104
    For the data presented, wind_x and wind_y are both negative - i.e. the resulting wind velocity vector points to the SW. AirData...
    • Graph8.png
  • sar104
    The FAA has not yet implemented a test for recreational pilots. All you need is the registration.
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Mavic Mini Lost in the Ocean.
    Yes - that's a good one. I can't add much to your analysis, but there are a couple of strange issues. Firstly - the left front motor...
    • amps.png
    • motor1.png
    • motor2.png
    • speed.png
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Aircraft Max Power Reached?.
    As mentioned by @slup, Litchi doesn't create a DAT log file.
  • sar104
    Interesting - I didn't realize that "Engineered and DatDefined" produced additional fields versus "Engineered then DatDefined"...
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    I guess so.
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    Sure - so this was never about the legality at all. Yet another pointless deflection.
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    Are you seriously asking if I fly recreationally at a restricted DOE facility? And on what are you asserting that the PIC should base...
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    I work at a DOE facility - one that actually is on that list in fact, and I've flown there so I'm well aware of the regulations. Where...
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    Above 400 ft would contravene Part 107.
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    No - designated means those that are listed. The discussion was not about facilities that it might not be prudent to fly over - it was...
  • sar104
    sar104 replied to the thread Unmarked no fly zones.
    Agreed. Welcome to the ignore list.