Split-Infinitive's latest activity
-
SSplit-Infinitive replied to the thread First member of public to have a go..That sign isnt legally valid for anything. No more than "free kittens" or "dont litter".
-
SSplit-Infinitive replied to the thread First member of public to have a go..The law is not pedantic. You couldnt be arsed to read purely because the contents directly contradict the view you want to be true. The head-in-the-sand approach really does nothing. The laws exist whether you choose to know them or not. Just...
-
SSplit-Infinitive replied to the thread First member of public to have a go..That again is legally incorrect. Your car is pretty often on private land which would require permission (albeit implied if its main public). The road is generally owned by highways or the council.
-
SSplit-Infinitive replied to the thread First member of public to have a go..Not strictly true. Data protection laws, privacy laws and the ANO all put clauses as to the use. Civil Aviation Actt 1982: landowner's rights generally extend only to the airspace reasonably necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of...
-
SSplit-Infinitive reacted to Gazwas's post in the thread First member of public to have a go. with
Like.
Just because the airspace is free to use as we choose under certain circumstances it doesn't automatically give us the right to pee people off. Just as the middle lane of a motorway is there to rightfully use how any tax paying motorist wishes...