Recent content by teckel

You're entitled to your opinion, albeit wrong in this case. Also, there's no reason to be insulting. The admin has already warned you. I'm sorry that I come from a background of knowledge and experience in this area and you don't which makes you angry. I'm glad to see that you've decided you...

I'm not mistaken and I did pay attention. The suggestion in their marketing material is that the focus distance is much further away than it is. To me, it sounds like someone else is mistaken and not paying attention as you pointed out, it's in their marketing material. Also, the focal...

Actually, the evidence shows the opposite of what you suggest. The fact the people who use +3 reading glasses need to use +6 reading glasses and those who normally don't but need to get +2 reading glasses shows that the focal plane is too close for correct vision. I'm also not talking about 4...

That's how some would deal with life's challenges. Thanks for the suggestion! Tim

You would be making your vision worse if you adjusted your eyes to see the DJI Goggles screen as they're designed for people with myopia. Basically, you would need to give yourself myopia to use the goggles without glasses. THAT'S what it's a design fail, not because they didn't include a...

Here's the problem, people that wear +3 reading glasses are reporting that they need +6 to use the goggles. Those that are young and don't wear reading glasses are reporting that they need +1.5 to +2 reading glasses to use the goggles. I can confirm these reports as well. The goggles have a...

That's like buying a Ferrari and putting snow tires on it. I'd rather Ferrari fix my $350k car instead of hacking it up on day one just so it's driveable. I have a prediction, there will be a non-hack fix for these goggles because EVERYONE has a problem with the focus distance, and installing...

No reason to call names! If a WOMAN was the audiophile, I also wouldn't read a speaker review from her husband. The parallelism of your wife was only made because it relates to your own comment. Tim

Wrong! It's very hard to see and stressful on the eyes to read the flight data in the bottom left corner because both eyes can't see that information at the same time. Only the left eye can see it. The reason why the goggles are unacceptable is BECAUSE I have perfect vision and have the...

No offence, but it's probably okay for your wife as she has no idea what to look for. The screen is a bit too close (even for those that don't need reading glasses), but that's only 1/3 of the problem. The other 2/3 of the problem is that you can't see the entire screen with both eyes so you...

You seem to be complacent of poorly designed products. Who cares if you don't mind seeing the entire screen? Some of us DO care. And those with perfect vision at all distances expect to see the screen without hacking a pair of brand new goggles with reading glasses and bubble gum! If you...

It's acceptable to add glasses if you already wear reading glasses. The issue is that there's design flaws with these goggles even for those with perfect vision at all distances that have never worn glasses. Tim

You probably do have 20/20 vision. The goggles were designed poorly with bad optics that require those with 20/20 vision to hack a brand new $450 set of goggles just to see. Don't blame your eyes, blame the goggles. Tim

The problem is that even reading glasses won't fix the problem as the screen is too large for the optics so you can't see the entire screen with each eye. This results in a non-sharp image which strains your eyes to see certain parts of the screen. For example, the flight information in the...

I've previously mentioned that I've recently been to the eye doctor, my vision checks out and I don't need glasses. I have extremely strong eye muscles and control from years of experience with binocular vision software development. I would argue that I have better vision so I can see glaring...