Torque's latest activity
-
I don't have a misconception. I'm curious as to why they need to fly below 400 feet? I'm implying that there could be an easy compromise to get more eyes in the sky without causing more danger. -
Really? Suggest that "the media" lied about the incident and shrug it off? Fox News, Huffington Post, and essentially every outlet in between reported the collision. You suggest that they might have all conspired to promote a falsehood?
-
Torque reacted to AMann's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with
Like.
More details here- interesting how the land owner tried to keep public lands to himself. There’s also interesting information about the unlawful enclosures act that prevents a land owner from fencing off public lands... -
Torque reacted to tstr14's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with Like.
That guy needs a "trip to the train station".
-
What does it matter? The idiot was violating a TFR!!!
