If your main use will be taking photographs (not video) the M3 Hassy camera is pretty darn good. The dynamic range of the M43 sensor is definitely greater than what Ai3 can do. There are third party programs such DxO PureRaw which can further enhance sharpness and reduce noise further expanding capabilities of these cameras enabling to shoot at high ISO and still getting very good quality outputs. As Mavic 3 Pro owner myself and M3 prior, I am personally leaning towards M3 or even M3Classic if you can still get it.
7x vs. 3x on the tele side and a MFT sensor vs. 1/1.3-inch sensor on the main camera. You decide.
Not true. Mavic3 has far superior signal strength to AIR3. Specially with RC PRO, its not comparable. MAVIC3 has DH full hack. I have it and I Dont have RID at all. ITs completely off. just need to have correct RC version.7x vs. 3x on the tele side and a MFT sensor vs. 1/1.3-inch sensor on the main camera. You decide.
That's the photo side.
On the transmission side, OS4 on the Air 3 is more robust than OS3+ on the Mavic 3.
Lastly, some initial Mavic 3's shipped without RID already enabled.
If you can afford it, get one of each, and see for yourself, and then just sell off the one you don't use.
That sounds like your photographic needs are quite specific. I never before heard an argument that photos taken with 24mm lens do not look realistic. Not sure what you mean by that.It is much more simpler as you may think.
For landscapes photography - MAVIC3
For all other types of photography and cinematic video - AIR3
I had both, I almost never used main camera on MAVIC3 its just too wide angle, photos are great of course but doesn't look realistic. 70mm camera that its the same on Air3 and M3PRO even with small sensor it will give better photos for me. Thats the main reason why Mavic3PRO was built because of lack of 70mm.
You need more imagination.I dont like landscapes photography with drone, its boring. You will never get a depth with 24mm. Human eye sees like 50mm, thats why 24mm is not realistic.
I had both, I almost never used main camera on MAVIC3 its just too wide angle, photos are great of course but doesn't look realistic.
Not realistic? No depth?You will never get a depth with 24mm. Human eye sees like 50mm, thats why 24mm is not realistic.
Interesting philosophy. So, you only shoot landscapes with 50mm lens? Care you post a few samples of your realistic landscapes with depth? In the meantime I shoot boring landscapes without depth with M3P 24mm like thisI dont like landscapes photography with drone, its boring. You will never get a depth with 24mm. Human eye sees like 50mm, thats why 24mm is not realistic.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.