- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 18
- Reactions
- 4
- Age
- 58
Climbing the learning curves and wanted to toss this out for review as I weigh the MPP vs. Air. I am leaning towards the Air because of my particular situation. But what am I overlooking?
Looking to do action photography on trails (linear route). This has some backcountry complications that are different from urban use.
My goal is 2 to 3 minute videos, so an hour of raw footage (3 batteries) is quite sufficient. Here is a recent example with a boom-mounted action cam:
This would be a typical sequence:
1. Carry the rig on a mountain bike or dirt bike along the trail
2. Stop, unpack, and prepare the quadcopter
3. Launch quadcopter
4. Capture landscape surrounding the rider(s)
5. Ride along the trail with the quadcopter following
6. Stop, take control for specific scenes, resume
7. Stop and recover quadcopter, typically at a different location than launch
8. Change battery or pack up rig, and continue on
Note there is a lot going on so automation that works reasonably well is desirable for this application. I don’t mind some “nanny” modes that others may object to.
Flight time: This “follow along” linear operation can be much shorter than sorties where the pilot flies out and then comes back to the same point as launch.
Air: 20 minutes between batteries is the biggest drawback of the Air? But 15 minutes seems sufficient because I don’t expect the quad to be out of sight.
1. Carrying. The equipment must be protected because falls are common. Typically I carry 15 to 30 lbs of backcountry gear on myself and the bike, so space is very limited.
Air: Being able to use a small Pelican 1120 box (7-3/8 inches inside) would be very good. This is the biggest appeal of the Air for me. Also more rugged gimbal system?
3. Launch and control. It appears that wifi mode would be sufficient for line of sight control. My plan is to use a Nexus 7 tablet, more than one if needed for battery life. I already carry a Nexus in a custom pack on my chest as I ride. If I only have to carry batteries and tablet(s), that would be very good.
Air: Seems better due to improved wifi performance and bands?
Big question: Will wifi connection be OK with the tablet mounted vertically on my chest, but sometimes facing away from the quadcopter? Assume 100 foot distance.
4. Landscape capture: Intelligent Flight Modes (IFMs) like Boomerang mode will be very helpful in reducing amount of work
Air: Has new modes like Boomerang and Asteroid, but has it also lost modes like Waypoints?
Still Photography Modes
Air: Has new panoramas for big landscapes
5. Ride and follow. My understanding is that FollowMe mode does not work well due to GPS imprecision.
Air: ActiveTrack is improved because of more on-board processing power. This could be very important especially in terrain with vegetation or large rocks that block the view of the rider.
7. Stop and recover at new location.
Air: Assuming practice, will wifi / tablet allow sufficient control for landing at a spot that I and the quadcopter have not seen before? Would the Gestures option be helpful?
Finally, the lower price of the Air is a selling point.
Any feedback or thoughts would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
Looking to do action photography on trails (linear route). This has some backcountry complications that are different from urban use.
My goal is 2 to 3 minute videos, so an hour of raw footage (3 batteries) is quite sufficient. Here is a recent example with a boom-mounted action cam:
This would be a typical sequence:
1. Carry the rig on a mountain bike or dirt bike along the trail
2. Stop, unpack, and prepare the quadcopter
3. Launch quadcopter
4. Capture landscape surrounding the rider(s)
5. Ride along the trail with the quadcopter following
6. Stop, take control for specific scenes, resume
7. Stop and recover quadcopter, typically at a different location than launch
8. Change battery or pack up rig, and continue on
Note there is a lot going on so automation that works reasonably well is desirable for this application. I don’t mind some “nanny” modes that others may object to.
Flight time: This “follow along” linear operation can be much shorter than sorties where the pilot flies out and then comes back to the same point as launch.
Air: 20 minutes between batteries is the biggest drawback of the Air? But 15 minutes seems sufficient because I don’t expect the quad to be out of sight.
1. Carrying. The equipment must be protected because falls are common. Typically I carry 15 to 30 lbs of backcountry gear on myself and the bike, so space is very limited.
Air: Being able to use a small Pelican 1120 box (7-3/8 inches inside) would be very good. This is the biggest appeal of the Air for me. Also more rugged gimbal system?
3. Launch and control. It appears that wifi mode would be sufficient for line of sight control. My plan is to use a Nexus 7 tablet, more than one if needed for battery life. I already carry a Nexus in a custom pack on my chest as I ride. If I only have to carry batteries and tablet(s), that would be very good.
Air: Seems better due to improved wifi performance and bands?
Big question: Will wifi connection be OK with the tablet mounted vertically on my chest, but sometimes facing away from the quadcopter? Assume 100 foot distance.
4. Landscape capture: Intelligent Flight Modes (IFMs) like Boomerang mode will be very helpful in reducing amount of work
Air: Has new modes like Boomerang and Asteroid, but has it also lost modes like Waypoints?
Still Photography Modes
Air: Has new panoramas for big landscapes
5. Ride and follow. My understanding is that FollowMe mode does not work well due to GPS imprecision.
Air: ActiveTrack is improved because of more on-board processing power. This could be very important especially in terrain with vegetation or large rocks that block the view of the rider.
7. Stop and recover at new location.
Air: Assuming practice, will wifi / tablet allow sufficient control for landing at a spot that I and the quadcopter have not seen before? Would the Gestures option be helpful?
Finally, the lower price of the Air is a selling point.
Any feedback or thoughts would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.