Insurance company uses drone footage to deny coverage.
One more reason for the Kens and Karen’s to pitch a fit at the sight of a drone.
One more reason for the Kens and Karen’s to pitch a fit at the sight of a drone.
No way of knowing really but most likely someone reported the situation to the insurance company or there was something else going on that has not been revealed. I know back in the day when I sold insurance, the only time we would do this type of investigation is if we received a report (this was pre-drone days lol).Very odd . . . can you imagine insurance companies would do this for all their 'customers' ?
I mean he's not had a claim with them for (was it) 15 years, so why'd they do this flight over, or use google maps / find other aerial imaging to check his property out ?
It just makes no economic sense they could / would do this for every client, even on a random basis.
It might make more sense to check out peoples greater acreage type properties, more isolated, not visible from the road, high fire risk areas etc, to assess risk.
I did read in the comments that some had insurance companies ask the client (householder) to take pics of various spots around their home FOR THEM !!
To be used to assess risk . . . if they didn't they'd not renew.
So the US forum member base is huge, anyone there ever had such a thing happen to them ?
Might be the next insurance profit maximising brainstorm idea, even if it makes little sense.
It just makes no economic sense they could / would do this for every client, even on a random basis.
The initial mention of a drone was probably an error on the part of a low-level employee, who automatically assumed that aerial photography came from a drone.Very odd . . . can you imagine insurance companies would do this for all their 'customers' ?
...
It just makes no economic sense they could / would do this for every client, even on a random basis.
Don't give any city's the idea of checking for ordnance violations with a drone.The initial mention of a drone was probably an error on the part of a low-level employee, who automatically assumed that aerial photography came from a drone.
No company is going to send out drone operators to individually check all policy renewals.
The company is likely to be subscribing to a service like www.nearmap.com
With their integration of GIS, it would be a simple matter to pull detailed, recent imagery for all policy renewals and possibly even have AI analyse imagery to find the things the insurance company might be concerned about.
Cities have been doing this for years.Don't give any city's the idea of checking for ordnance violations with a drone.
No insurance company is sending drones to investigate individual customers.What next, GEICO will send a drone to follow your commute to work to see how you drive? Unlike putting a tracker on your car to record your driving habits, they don't need your consent to spy on you using a drone. States cannot stop the flights but they can impact the policy terms with new state laws. Unfortunately there will be a few early "victims" before this gets sorted.
The initial mention of a drone was probably an error on the part of a low-level employee, who automatically assumed that aerial photography came from a drone.
No company is going to send out drone operators to individually check all policy renewals.
The company is likely to be subscribing to a service like www.nearmap.com
With their integration of GIS, it would be a simple matter to pull detailed, recent imagery for all policy renewals and possibly even have AI analyse imagery to find the things the insurance company might be concerned about.
Nearmap fly monthly and have a comprehensive archive.Nearmap type service is possible, but how recent do pics have to be, possibly years out of date ?
And again, why would they do that for specific or random policy holders ?
Most TV viewers (unless they watched the entire news report) will think an unruly drone pilot was the source of the photos; not a manned aircraft.Insurance company uses drone footage to deny coverage.
One more reason for the Kens and Karen’s to pitch a fit at the sight of a drone.
Most unlikely.But I do agree, someone (neighbor) complained and that's what got him in trouble.
Boy wouldn't that be a huge boom in the drone pilot industry if they did.lolNo insurance company is sending drones to investigate individual customers.
I'm on a photo site, and a few times people said things like "drones are creepy" when I shared aerial photos of abandoned barns or farm houses. Not sure why, but when I asked if, instead, I'd stood on a ladder with a regular camera, would that be less creepy, they usually didn't answer.Insurance company uses drone footage to deny coverage.
One more reason for the Kens and Karen’s to pitch a fit at the sight of a drone.