Note the "67W" mention in your circled text.
As shown here, it can charge one port at
67W or two ports at
65W:
View attachment 167740
View attachment 167741
Count me skeptical, despite the diagram.
Only because in order to deliver 65W on both ports, the charger would have to have a 130W output capacity,
Actually, I think this is a 67W total charger, split among the ports in use. You kind of have to read tea leaves on the Amazon page to deduce this, as it looks like Anker departs a bit from everyone else in how they describe the port configurations.
The biggest reason in my judgement to interpret it this way is the comparison chart on the page:
Note the consistent way the "Main Feature" is described for each model, 67W, 100W, 240W: "xxxW Max X Port Charging".
We can rule out that any of the ports are delivering 240W on the highest capacity version, so that's not a per-port spec. Looking around the site at other chargers, 240W is common, and refers to the combined output capacity across ports, which I'm certain is the case here too.
Second strong piece of evidence: On the page, it shows the 3-port spec this way:
Interpreting this in the same way as the 2-port diagram above, this would mean the charger is actually capable of a total output of 64.5x3=193.5W, which is definitely not the case.
I'm pretty sure this is a 67W charger split among the three ports, and can not output 65W on both USB-C ports simultaneously.
Finally, went to the Anker site, downloaded the User Manual for this charger, examined the specs. They're a bit ambiguous too! However, if I were to rely on any number, it would be Total output below: