This motherboard article came out today. It's a pretty interesting read and gives us some insight in to why DJI is pushing the NFZ so hard.
Unless you are a billion dollar international company. Then you need to protect yourself from exposure by doing what you can do/being able to say you did something.Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't the custom built, heavy lift drones immune from the NFZ firmware? And the tiny drones like Mavics with almost no payload capacity are restricted? Seems very impractical.
I'm curious though, aren't they opening themselves up to litigation by taking on the role of a regulatory agency? If they unlock an area that ends up causing an incident they are likely more culpable than if they just left it up to the government.Unless you are a billion dollar international company. Then you need to protect yourself from exposure by doing what you can do/being able to say you did something.
I'm curious though, aren't they opening themselves up to litigation by taking on the role of a regulatory agency? If they unlock an area that ends up causing an incident they are likely more culpable than if they just left it up to the government.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.