Regulations affect DJI too. Consider beyond your world that DJI could have had to include restrictive elements of their software to continue offering hardware that the government might have otherwise told them would be too much of a threat unless they could add restrictions to the software...
Only a juvenile would suggest that their possible maiming of someone could be left to chance. I bet you tell you parents when you will have an accident, too, right? What about when someone's head is hit and it's fault? What's your excuse then, blame DJI, expect someone else to wipe up the blood...
Sounds like that generally, you people think screwing up, ignoring rules meant to protect others should be ignored or treated very gently—until it's your turn to sue? Slaps on wrists are what got us here where people want to make exceptions rather then examples. Look up "exemplary," it means...
What a pity that drones have sparked such an argument. Of course, up front torches and pitchforks in hand are the mental minions who reject any reason with their insistence that they be able to do what they want, no matter what, essentially, "because I want to!"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.