High_Order1's latest activity
-
High_Order1 replied to the thread US FAA regulation reference minimum height.That last sentence I bolded is what I understood before I found the relatively new addition to my state's trespass law. So, is it from the ground up? Or is it a minimum? I can't find the minimum in the FAA. But I am also not doing an effective... -
High_Order1 replied to the thread US FAA regulation reference minimum height.it literally says " not regulated as navigable airspace" I took that to mean non-navigable. You are saying it means simply not regulated. The FAA says right on their 101 for drones page: So, I agree that words have meaning. To me, following...
-
High_Order1 reacted to Felix le Chat's post in the thread US FAA regulation reference minimum height with
Like.
As a foreigner, I'm finding this fascinating. Firstly, the wording clearly suggests that Tennessee State Law supersedes Federal Law, then goes on to suggest that a National Asset (airspace) directly over a set area of land has become privately... -
We don't need drone coverage, we need to bring back public hangings for these type crimes.
-
High_Order1 reacted to GadgetGuy's post in the thread We Ask Again: Where Were the Drones? with Like.
It's also my understanding that he deliberately did not want to have high security at his events, in a personal assumption of the risk of this type of vulnerability.