I will say that no sharpening was applied to any of these images, though other edits were.
I'd guess the Mavic 3 Pro tele camera would have looked somewhere between the Mavic 3 Original tele camera and my Fujifilm with its tele lens. Unfortunately the Mavic 3 Pro (being an EASA C2 Class drone)...
Yes, this is precisely what I was trying to illustrate. I used a worse lens/sensor (Mavic 3 wide camera) from closer and it produced a superior image to a better lens/sensor (Fujifilm APS-C) that was used from farther away.
The name of the lens is "55-200mm" but it is an APS-C sensor so shooting at 200mm has an effective focal length of shooting 300mm on full frame. I am comparing 3 cameras with 3 different sensor sizes so it just makes sense to normalize all focal lengths to full frame terms. Otherwise I'd have...
Correct, different lenses but also very different sensors. Technically 2 different cameras entirely which just happen to share a gimbal.
The wide camera uses a 4/3” sensor and the tele camera uses a 1/2” sensor. Doesn’t sound like a huge difference but by area the wide camera’s sensor is more...
I've had this screenshot sitting on my desktop for a while now, figured this is as good a time as any to share it. All images were taken within a few minutes.
The top left image was taken with my Fujifilm X-T3 with 55-200mm lens @ 150mm from 1500m distance.
The top right image was taken with my...
I would say that CPLs are:
Essential for Photography
Potentially Annoying for Drone Video
When a CPL is used properly your results will be better than without, but when used improperly your results will be worse than without.
I usually use Capture One’s built-in pano stitching, but I recently started using AutoPanoGiga which is free software and generally has been working better than Capture One. Sometimes the built-in stitching struggles with image sets that APG has no problem with...
I don’t know anything about the Mavic 2 but I’m a pixel peeping photographer and the corner sharpness from my Mavic 3 is very acceptable in real world use from f/4 or f/5.6. Dynamic range is good but even shooting raw I find you can get some weird looking results if you mess with exposure or...
I shot a brick wall about a year ago with my Mavic 3, and the results were:
Center sharpness sweet spot is f/2.8 to f/5.6. Corner sharpness sweet spot is f/4 to f/5.6. The image is fine up to f/8 but diffraction starts to be noticeable. Diffraction is heavy by f/11. I pretty much just leave it...
Assuming the Mavic 4 follows the trend of being >900g, the original Mavic 3 will be the best drone ever made that you can fly with basically no restrictions in Europe. That theory doesn’t help answer your question about new US stock though.
I am a big fan of GND filters and love that this exists, unfortunately it is just not a good filter and consequently I can confidently not recommend it.
2 Major Problems:
There is a strong blue color cast over the entire image. This is fixable in post, but the bigger issue is that the color...
There are definitely some RID bugs in my experience. I get that message whenever I turn the drone on first, rather than turning the controller on first and then the drone. Any chance you are turning the controller off between flights?