LoudThunder's latest activity
-
LoudThunder reacted to Hauptmann's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with
Like.
My guess is that the Supreme Court will decline to hear the case. -
Welcome tothe forum from Northwest New Jersey.
-
LoudThunder reacted to anotherlab's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with Like.
For what it's worth, the couple that filed the lawsuit did not dispute the federal height limit; they based their claim that removing the trees would violate the California Environmental Quality Act. The city had made this statement to local...
-
LoudThunder reacted to GadgetGuy's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with
Wow.
Thank you for the correction. Whether or not the trees needed to come down and the homeowners displeasure with their removal is the takeaway. I thought I had read that many concerned citizens were unaware of the intent to remove the trees until... -
LoudThunder reacted to hank970's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with Wow.
I like trees, but if I lived beneath a major airport's flight path, I think I'd be more concerned about constant noise than the fate of a few trees. I wouldn't want to live downwind of pig or chicken farm either.