LoudThunder's latest activity
-
LoudThunder reacted to hank970's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with
Wow.
Yes, I think you took my remarks too seriously. -
LoudThunder replied to the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle?.In a nutshell, Michigan is not legally bound to return a deposit on a container when no deposit was paid in the first place. To request a return on a deposit when no deposit was not paid in the first place is considered Fraud in Michigan… So...
-
-
LoudThunder reacted to tstr14's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with
Haha.
Sounds reminiscent to the line from the movie Judge Dredd: "Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and OK for you." -
LoudThunder reacted to GadgetGuy's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with Wow.
Suffice it to say that their version of a sustainable and resilient San Diego isn't mine, nor that of the majority of long time San Diego residents, who wanted San Diego to stay San Diego, rather than become southern Los Angeles or northern...
-
LoudThunder reacted to MS Coast's post in the thread Can this ultimately affect drones that fly over another person's property simply based on principle? with Wow.
So, you're not a fan of their efforts to meet that goal or the goal? Is the city's claim that the FAA requested that the 20 trees be removed false? Or did the city somehow pressure to FAA to make the request?
