Are Sky Swaps Still Legal? New 2026 law for Real Estate Photos

[sarahb]

Is this coming to or does it already exist in your state?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[GFields]

I really don't see any harm in sky replacement and brightening the image to make it more appealing. I do, however, see where removing objects (permanent objects) that create an "eye sore" or misrepresent the property to be a major issue, as it changes everything. If, in the event I remove powerlines, cars, or any obstacles, I provide the client with both and let them decide. As the guy in the video stated, if the client decides to use the edited image, it then falls on them. I do think I will start including some type of statement as he discussed, to protect myself, though.

For now, it is not a law in Alabama, but I think it is only right that transparency is important in ANY buying/selling experience.

 

[FLDave]

Check with your MLS provider. When listing on the MLS they have specific requirements as to what and how you list picture information which is not exact. If you are not listing with MLS they you just have to be truthful; otherwise and unhappy buy might have a reason to claim untruthful advertise.
To my knowledge MLS does permit sky replacement--even though it often looks out of place.

 

[sarahb]

Check with your MLS provider. When listing on the MLS they have specific requirements as to what and how you list picture information which is not exact. If you are not listing with MLS they you just have to be truthful; otherwise and unhappy buy might have a reason to claim untruthful advertise.
To my knowledge MLS does permit sky replacement--even though it often looks out of place.

Any type of digitally altered image must be occupied by a disclaimer.

 

[sarahb]

I really don't see any harm in sky replacement and brightening the image to make it more appealing. I do, however, see where removing objects (permanent objects) that create an "eye sore" or misrepresent the property to be a major issue, as it changes everything. If, in the event I remove powerlines, cars, or any obstacles, I provide the client with both and let them decide. As the guy in the video stated, if the client decides to use the edited image, it then falls on them. I do think I will start including some type of statement as he discussed, to protect myself, though.

For now, it is not a law in Alabama, but I think it is only right that transparency is important in ANY buying/selling experience.

Thank you for your input. I really don't have a problem providing a disclaimer and agree that many images that I have seen have been altered to the point that it no longer represents what the property truly looks like. An example that comes to mind is a listing that had "inground" pool had been digitally removed and the color of the house changed. This is unacceptable. It is really sad that a law has to be implemented to keep people honest. In today's market many use the internet, images, and videos to do much, if not all, of their house hunting. Can you imagine living in NY and finding (what you thought) was your dream home in CA to get there and see something different than what you were expecting.

I was mainly curious if this law exists in other states.

Thanks for sharing.

 

[YorksPhotos]

Not sure about sky swaps but California signed a new law effective Jan 1 regarding real estate imaging for advertisement.
Article here from San Francisco Chronicle.
New California law means big changes for photos of homes in real estate listings

 

[mavic3usa]

Not sure about sky swaps but California signed a new law effective Jan 1 regarding real estate imaging for advertisement.
Article here from San Francisco Chronicle.
New California law means big changes for photos of homes in real estate listings

The AI hysteria is real and it won't be long before many more aspects of life will have similar laws regarding "AI-altered content." Editing software like Davinci Resolve will one day be called Davinci Resolve AI because there won't be anything about it that doesn't have something AI-related even if it's simple color grading so the laws (that won't keep up) would mean import a video into DR and it instantly qualifies.

I guess we have to go thru a phase until everyone is used to it and no one is "deceived" and then this goes away....until the next one. I feel like we've been thru this a couple of times already.

 

[sarahb]

Not sure about sky swaps but California signed a new law effective Jan 1 regarding real estate imaging for advertisement.
Article here from San Francisco Chronicle.
New California law means big changes for photos of homes in real estate listings

Thank you. That is exactly the point of my post

 

[anotherlab]

Not sure about sky swaps but California signed a new law effective Jan 1 regarding real estate imaging for advertisement.
Article here from San Francisco Chronicle.
New California law means big changes for photos of homes in real estate listings

California's Assembly Bill No. 723 doesn't explicitly call out changes to the sky, but it doesn't exclude it either.

Real estate brokers & sales staff working on their behalf would need to add a disclosure that the picture had been altered, and if it's posted online, they would need to provide a link to the unaltered image. Edits like color correction and cropping would not require the disclosure.

IANAL, but if you use Lightroom to color grade the sky, that would probably be OK. If you replace the sky, then it would probably fall under the 723 rules.