Persuaded? Not necessary. As I've alluded to in several of these posts a holistic approach is the only thing practical -- i.e. operational efficiency -- but the discussion was about the most efficient speed.
Are we talking about overall operational efficiency now? If so, I have plenty to say on that too
Back to the topic at hand, I still haven't seen anything posted -- by you as well -- altering anything I've said trying to answer the question, what is the most efficient speed to fly at? What indicated speed, in this practical situation of flying with DJI GO4, will yield the greatest distance traveled?
I've tried to answer that question as accurately, usefully, and meaningfully as possible. Do you dispute anything I've said? Do you have a different explanation, that yields some sort of speed value we can monitor, that will give greater travel distance for remaining battery than I've offered?
If we want to have a discussion of overall operational efficiency, I think that would be a really good thing to do. Far too many new owners don't have any idea what sort of planning is really helpful to, well, make sure you get your bird back. Or what do you do "on the fly" when you find the wind conditions, for example, differ from what you had planned.
But that's not what we were talking about, I thought. The question was much simpler than that, and I've tried to explain, starting simply, why it can't really be handled with a simple answer like, "25".
For that some juvenile felt it necessary to toss some insults.
