The FAA does not use categories. Only sub 250 grams, 250 grams up to 55lbs. And those over 55lbs.
Doesn't Cat 1 need RID for this?Remote ID is not yet finalized. That's DJI's version of what they "think" RID might require but it's nothing that meets FAA's requirements since they are not yet released.
No one is flying a cat2, 3, or 4 UAS yet. The only people flying a legal OOP are flying under Cat 1 only.
Doesn't Cat 1 need RID for this?
Yes this is correct, of course.Only for Open Air Assemblies .....
From the link I posted above:
Ops over People, Category 1:
The PIC must use an aircraft that:
•Weighs less than 250g (.55 lbs.), and
•Contains no “exposed rotating parts that would lacerate human skin upon impact with a human being”.
•There are no manufacturer requirements for Declaration of Compliance. It will be incumbent upon the PIC to make sure the UAS qualifies.
•No sustained flights over open air assemblies w/o RID (concerts, construction sites, etc.).
•Goes into effect on 4/21/21.
•No flights over open-air assemblies w/o RID.
Yes this is correct, of course.
Thank you.
That open air assemble catches me.
But even then we have the props to take into account and then you are put of the weight class if you aff prop guards.
Catch 22.
This really is AMAZING technology !Keep in mind that odds are future UAS will be lighter and much more capable than what we have available right now. It should be easier to be within the regs with future aircraft.
Can we assume that because of advances in technology that drones will be designed and built to be able to meet the new rules, or are the new rules designed to try to curb drone ownership by making it too difficult to comply to the rules even when said rules become tighter because of perceived incidents, cheers Len
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.