I was always under the impression that the back legs were short to give the props the proper angle for taking off easily BUT I think you have something here The legs sort of make a tripod this way. makes for a much more stable landing4) 'three' points of contact is, in some ways, more stable and useful than four points of contact. Think camera and theodolite tripods.
True, a chicken and egg thing lol. I think there is a lot more to the design of these drones than meets the eye at first glance.Plus- I suppose they could use any size legs they want and just mount the motors with the correct Thrust line. So theres that
Yorkshire, I haven’t watched that closely but I will next time out. Thanks.I do not think the chosen heights of the undercarriage are to do with the "efficiency" of each prop.
Rather I think they are chosen so that, when the drone is on the ground, the sum/total of the torques created by each motor is zero as is the sum/total of the horizontal thrusts being generated by each prop.
Note, if you look closely I suspect that you will find that none of the props are rotating about an axis that is perpedicular to the surface on which the drone is sitting.
If you put a drone on a tilted flat surface, start its motors with the CSC then SLOWLY throttle up I think you will find that it first lifts the 'downslope' motors/undercarriage, then, once the drone is nominally horizontal, it will then take off. I have done this several times.
BE CAREFUL if the initial tilt is significant just incase the upslope props hit the 'further upslope' ground.
In reverse, if you are careful controlling the descent speed, I think you will find that the drone will touch down the upslope undercarriage first then lower the downslope undercarriage. I might have done this.
PS if the slope is too steep the drone will not start its motors.
It was a bit surprising the first time I saw it lol, it might have even been a hand launch, eeek.Yorkshire, I haven’t watched that closely but I will next time out. Thanks.
At least it was a takeoff. After a couple hundred hand catches, I also was not as careful as I should have been and it took me two months to fully recover. I can laugh about it now.… I might not have been as careful about my hand being horizontal as I should have been lol.
and they just have stubs at the rear instead of legs like the front. Why is that ?
I guess it could’ve been worse if the blades were metal !At least it was a takeoff. After a couple hundred hand catches, I also was not as careful as I should have been and it took me two months to fully recover. I can laugh about it now.
Wow, it gets pretty technical. On my mini I had clip-on skids to lift the mini up a little higher off the ground. I haven’t noticed if that tilt was maintained or if the mini became horizontal to the ground. Will check it out.I do not think the chosen heights of the undercarriage are to do with the "efficiency" of each prop.
Rather I think they are chosen so that, when the drone is on the ground, the sum/total of the torques created by each motor is zero as is the sum/total of the horizontal thrusts being generated by each prop.
Note, if you look closely I suspect that you will find that none of the props are rotating about an axis that is perpedicular to the surface on which the drone is sitting.
If you put a drone on a tilted flat surface, start its motors with the CSC then SLOWLY throttle up I think you will find that it first lifts the 'downslope' motors/undercarriage, then, once the drone is nominally horizontal, it will then take off. I have done this several times.
BE CAREFUL if the initial tilt is significant just incase the upslope props hit the 'further upslope' ground.
In reverse, if you are careful controlling the descent speed, I think you will find that the drone will touch down the upslope undercarriage first then lower the downslope undercarriage. I might have done this.
PS if the slope is too steep the drone will not start its motors.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.