Drone shot at today!

[AMann]

Some people shouldn’t own one at all, they are irresponsible and their loved ones often pay the ultimate price because of it. Then there’s the crazy ones that think they can do stuff like this…The owner was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon- should have also been attempted murder as he was shooting at the guys while they were driving away.

 

[Dan'sUavTech]

Some people shouldn’t own one at all, they are irresponsible

In full agreement!

 

[Mrktn]

@Tristar500 any further news on this?

 

[Tower669]

yes please. status updates?

 

[mavic3usa]

Here's an example of someone shining a laser at a manned aircraft and you can compare that to shining a laser at an unmanned aircraft when you think about federal prosecutors or juries. I'll leave this here:

Man Charged With Shining Laser Pointer At Trump’s Helicopter Acquitted In 35 Minutes

It's another embarrassing outcome for Jeanine Pirro, who tried to "make a felon out of a homeless man with nothing but a cat toy keychain."

www.aol.com

 

[anotherlab]

Here's an example of someone shining a laser at a manned aircraft and you can compare that to shining a laser at an unmanned aircraft when you think about federal prosecutors or juries. I'll leave this here:

Man Charged With Shining Laser Pointer At Trump’s Helicopter Acquitted In 35 Minutes

It's another embarrassing outcome for Jeanine Pirro, who tried to "make a felon out of a homeless man with nothing but a cat toy keychain."

www.aol.com

The man in question was acquitted because he was carrying a red laser cat toy, and he aimed it up because an officer had shone a flashlight in his face. The jury believed that he was not aiming at any aircraft.

Had he been aiming at an aircraft with a green laser with enough power to reach the cockpit, the trial could have been very different.

 

[mavic3usa]

The man in question was acquitted because he was carrying a red laser cat toy, and he aimed it up because an officer had shone a flashlight in his face. The jury believed that he was not aiming at any aircraft.

Had he been aiming at an aircraft with a green laser with enough power to reach the cockpit, the trial could have been very different.

"During the interview, S-1 admitted to pointing the red laser pointer at Marine One. [defendant] said he did not know he could not point the laser at Marine One; he said he points the laser at all kinds of things, such as stop signs."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285272/gov.uscourts.dcd.285272.1.1.pdf