I live in Portugal.
Specific UAV legislation has been passed here, last December, a legislation that, in general, is quite reasonable and easy to comply with, exception made for the completely arbitrary number of people we're allowed to fly over - groups of no more than12 people...Why 12...?...You tell me...
Now, given some specific local cultural traits and the wider, more general phobias about drones, I keep stumbling upon self-appointed police officers wannabes that try to evoke how flying my drone is forbidden in whatever "restricted" space fancies their will.
Showing them a photocopy of my ATPL license and asking if they want to see the PDF of the appropriate legislation that is always on my tab is usually enough to turn the conversation around into "so, how fun is it to fly these things?" so, to me, these wanna be "prohibitors" are not much of a problem.
Still, I also keep finding more and more places, at local council or state-owned level that have put in place restrictions that are not contemplated by law.
These are more difficult to contend with in the field, as any attempts to argue the non-validity of such dispositions is bound to face strong resistance up to the point of ruinning that day's sortie due to sheer non-focused and non-productive wasted time.
From these forums, I get the impression that this is not a specific problem only in my country but rather a well-spread phenomena whereas, say, a town council, somewhere, feels empowered to overrule national legislation, legislation that has been dutifully set up by the only agencies that have jurisdiction over each national airspace.
Isn't it time for UAV users associations to get legal counseling and fight the possible "misappropriation" of airspace by any Jack or Joe that feels it is their right to regulate over "their" particular airspace just because they happen to be a subsidiary, possibly just local, sub-agency of an otherwise much larger, already organized and well-legislated state?
I mean, should it be left to local councils and such to say, for instance, that diesel running cars can not drive on their local roads when national legislation has no such provisions?
What do you guys think?
MK
Specific UAV legislation has been passed here, last December, a legislation that, in general, is quite reasonable and easy to comply with, exception made for the completely arbitrary number of people we're allowed to fly over - groups of no more than12 people...Why 12...?...You tell me...

Now, given some specific local cultural traits and the wider, more general phobias about drones, I keep stumbling upon self-appointed police officers wannabes that try to evoke how flying my drone is forbidden in whatever "restricted" space fancies their will.
Showing them a photocopy of my ATPL license and asking if they want to see the PDF of the appropriate legislation that is always on my tab is usually enough to turn the conversation around into "so, how fun is it to fly these things?" so, to me, these wanna be "prohibitors" are not much of a problem.
Still, I also keep finding more and more places, at local council or state-owned level that have put in place restrictions that are not contemplated by law.
These are more difficult to contend with in the field, as any attempts to argue the non-validity of such dispositions is bound to face strong resistance up to the point of ruinning that day's sortie due to sheer non-focused and non-productive wasted time.
From these forums, I get the impression that this is not a specific problem only in my country but rather a well-spread phenomena whereas, say, a town council, somewhere, feels empowered to overrule national legislation, legislation that has been dutifully set up by the only agencies that have jurisdiction over each national airspace.
Isn't it time for UAV users associations to get legal counseling and fight the possible "misappropriation" of airspace by any Jack or Joe that feels it is their right to regulate over "their" particular airspace just because they happen to be a subsidiary, possibly just local, sub-agency of an otherwise much larger, already organized and well-legislated state?
I mean, should it be left to local councils and such to say, for instance, that diesel running cars can not drive on their local roads when national legislation has no such provisions?
What do you guys think?
MK