I understand in a perfect world you would want perfect exposure and your shutter to be double your FPS. But I'm curious let's say you get one chance to take a shot and could only choose one which would it be?
I know a lot of people preach double the shutter to get the blur right, but does it really matter if you're flying straight forward or backwards taking wide landscape shots? Looking back at a lot of my footage I took the whole double shutter rule seriously and ended up with either really over exposed or under exposed shots just because the situations didn't allow for multiple takes or time to fiddle with ND filters. Now since I have more free time and just flying I noticed that I can't really tell the difference if the shutter isn't exactly double the FPS on the high altitude wide landscape frames. Or am I just not looking for the right things?
I know a lot of people preach double the shutter to get the blur right, but does it really matter if you're flying straight forward or backwards taking wide landscape shots? Looking back at a lot of my footage I took the whole double shutter rule seriously and ended up with either really over exposed or under exposed shots just because the situations didn't allow for multiple takes or time to fiddle with ND filters. Now since I have more free time and just flying I noticed that I can't really tell the difference if the shutter isn't exactly double the FPS on the high altitude wide landscape frames. Or am I just not looking for the right things?
