By operating a drone with RID, you have already given consent for your information to be broadcast.
The decision in
Brennon v. Dickson ruled that RID does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
The court stated that flying a drone in open air is a public activity, similar to driving a car on public roads. Since the activity is observable by anyone, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the drone's location.
The mere capability for surveillance does not violate Fourth Amendment protections.
Only the FAA has access to the database that correlates the serial number with the owner's identity, and that information can only be accessed under specific, limited circumstances.