test2000Anafi
Well-Known Member
That might be why they want to ‘mainstream’ the RC controller with screen built in: no more phone updates breaking compatibility. Providing mission-critical drones even sub-1000 dollar
Ummm, But they still support (and are selling) the "regular" standard controller with the Mini 3 which means they will still need to support IOS and Android "forever" as long as they sell them. I'd hate for the ONLY option to be a sucky 5" screen (don't care how "bright" it is 'casue I barely can read it) so I doubt they will ever rid themselves of IOS and ANDRIOID apps and updates unless of course they require a vision test before purchase. It's highly likely they will sell more WITHOUT the (allegedly) smart controller due to price.That might be why they want to ‘mainstream’ the RC controller with screen built in: no more phone updates breaking compatibility. Providing mission-critical drones even sub-1000 dollar
Start a GoFundMe to subsidize a Mini 3 since your work will benefit everyone.
TT3023 Thank you to the original poster and TT3023 for your insight. Together you've answered my biggest questions about this drone.And notably, everything I've seen so far indicates that when using the standard RC-N1 controller the M3 Pro will have exactly the same characteristics as with the new phoneless controller. That is, it will reportedly use O3, have the same range and return video resolution, etc.
Lol! I did just that. Picked up a used RC231 off eBay. Didn’t want to wait 3 extra months or whatever it was for the RC231 kit. Figured I could eventually easily sell the new remote. The screen on my Samsung S21 Ultra (which is a spare phone) is bigger and brighter than the new remote screen.If you are going to buy a Mini 3 Pro and want the controller pro option (I know I will) and will want to run 3rd party apps (I know I will lol) then there is always some poor soul who’s lost their Mini 2 or Air 2(s) selling the controller off to recover some of the loss. Pair that with your Mini 3 pro and favourite smart device and problem solved.
Regards
Ari
Hi. Thanks much for your thoughts. However, I am not interested in and will not accept monetary donations related to this.
On the technical front, I want to be clear about a few details. Assuming that the technique used for the Mini 2 prior to its support in the MSDK will also work for the Mini 3 prior to its support in the MSDK, this does not mean you can run commercial programs like Litchi, that depend on direct support in the MSDK to function. They have to wait for the formal DJI support.
What this technique does do is provide an interface to MAVLink applications, e.g. QGroundControl or (in theory, though I've never tested it) Mission Planner, such as are commonly used in the PX4 drone world. There are some limitations. Manually designated waypoints works, though currently the "automated mapping" functions of QGroundControl are not implemented, for example.
Another issue is that while source and instructions for building the app yourself could be provided, it would not be practical to distribute prebuilt versions of the app, due to the limitations and potential costs involved for the Google Maps and DJI API usage required (both effectively free at individual use levels, but distributed the costs could pile up).
So I wanted to be clear on these points. Thanks again.
Testing the Mini 3 should be relatively straightforward. I don't need the new RC (and I'm seeing dismal reports regarding range using it currently in any case). And I already have an RC-N1. Unfortunately, the Mini 3 without a controller seems to have among the longest lead times, so I don't think this is going to happen very soon.Hi. Thanks much for your thoughts. However, I am not interested in and will not accept monetary donations related to this.
On the technical front, I want to be clear about a few details. Assuming that the technique used for the Mini 2 prior to its support in the MSDK will also work for the Mini 3 prior to its support in the MSDK, this does not mean you can run commercial programs like Litchi, that depend on direct support in the MSDK to function. They have to wait for the formal DJI support.
What this technique does do is provide an interface to MAVLink applications, e.g. QGroundControl or (in theory, though I've never tested it) Mission Planner, such as are commonly used in the PX4 drone world. There are some limitations. Manually designated waypoints works, though currently the "automated mapping" functions of QGroundControl are not implemented, for example.
Another issue is that while source and instructions for building the app yourself could be provided, it would not be practical to distribute prebuilt versions of the app, due to the limitations and potential costs involved for the Google Maps and DJI API usage required (both effectively free at individual use levels, but distributed the costs could pile up).
So I wanted to be clear on these points. Thanks again.
So I'm pretty satisfied with testing so far on the Mini 2, and I'll proceed to test with Mini 3 when I can get my hands on one. As I mentioned above, I only need the drone itself, not a controller since this testing of the app would be with the RC-N1 anyway which of course I have. If anyone sees a source for the M3/with one battery FCC version (no controller) that is available earlier than the end of August (the sooner the better) please let me know. Thanks.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.