Louisiana Gov. Landry signs new drone defense law; first in nation

[tstr14]

Exactly.

Who would challenge the law, on what legal grounds, and why would they do that? Who would get up and argue the federal government has the sole legal authority to disable a drone believed to be a threat by state and local law enforcement?

Any one whose drone was shot at/down?

 

[Chip]

Any one whose drone was shot at/down?

Okay. Such a person might have sufficient actual damage to have standing. So then let us say a $4000 drone was disabled by a state law enforcement officer for an allegedly illegal or reckless flight. Who has the time or resources to sue the state of Louisiana in federal court for allegedly violating the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution over a $4,000 drone? It would be a staggering undertaking and think of what you have to prove to win.

 

[tstr14]

Okay. Such a person might have sufficient actual damage to have standing. So then let us say a $4000 drone was disabled by a state law enforcement officer for an allegedly illegal or reckless flight. Who has the time or resources to sue the state of Louisiana in federal court for allegedly violating the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution over a $4,000 drone? It would be a staggering undertaking and think of what you have to prove to win.

Well if you want to talk about hypothetical cases, what about a 5 year old child permanently blinded when the wreckage of shot up, out of control strikes him? Or a damaged drone that starts a wildfire that burns several hundred acres and a dozen homes? Or the wreckage of a drone that strikes the windshield of a car, causing an accident that claims 3 people?

More likely, how about a group of drone operators pooling together to challenge the law?

 

[mavic3usa]

Well if you want to talk about hypothetical cases, what about a 5 year old child permanently blinded when the wreckage of shot up, out of control strikes him? Or a damaged drone that starts a wildfire that burns several hundred acres and a dozen homes? Or the wreckage of a drone that strikes the windshield of a car, causing an accident that claims 3 people?

More likely, how about a group of drone operators pooling together to challenge the law?

We won't be able to do this alone or individually. As I've mentioned before, we need groups to advocate on our behalf and activists to get behind this and an organization to help the community fight for our rights. How's it going to look when you take the state to court and they walk in with the FAA behind them supporting them?

Otherwise we can go the social movement route, that seems to work but it might take some time. This is where my vote stands.

 

[Chip]

Well if you want to talk about hypothetical cases, what about a 5 year old child permanently blinded when the wreckage of shot up, out of control strikes him? Or a damaged drone that starts a wildfire that burns several hundred acres and a dozen homes? Or the wreckage of a drone that strikes the windshield of a car, causing an accident that claims 3 people?

More likely, how about a group of drone operators pooling together to challenge the law?

In the case of people hit by debris, or debris causing fire, I would say that would be handled in accordance with every state's own tort or negligence liability laws which may vary. No different than any situation where the police respond to a suspected crime in progress which somehow causes injury to an innocent bystander. It requires law enforcement to use good judgment or face potential negligence liability. But that is why they have public risk departments and insurance. A group of drone operators could get together and pool resources but unless their drones have been shot down they probably lack "standing" to sue.