BlakPhoenix
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2016
- Messages
- 165
- Reactions
- 74
Easy boss, you're opinion is just as valid as mine. I think another 0.4 of a pound by the time it gets to the ground will be ever so more dangerous than without.
I think they would be great, but telling everyone it's more safe to fly over people and property with them isn't true either. I believe Mavic's fall out of the sky... and the props hitting something is rarely the cause. I've seen many times the prop hits, it free-falls and recovers itself. Lost of crashs are cause by other things like batteries coming loose etc.
I simply just don't like the price. They would be nice for indoor flying, I'm not so sure about falling on people. 1/4lb is a 1/4 more to hit you with.
I agree that the price is not for everyone, but they certainly do serve a great purpose for those flying commercially and need to get close to people. There's no point flying up high with them, they reduce flight time too much and there's nothing to hit up high. They seem to be designed for close quarters flying and indoor flying where propellers do cause the most harm.
They are heavier, but they also spread out the points of impact over a larger area making them potentially less dangerous. The Mavic with these on is still less weight than a Phantom, and so very unlikely to cause harm.
In Australia, if you want to fly close to people you must show that you can avoid harm to those around you, these go well on the way to allowing that.