Used to do a lot of bracketing with my mini 2, but found that the raw dng files on the 2s have enough dynamic range that bracketing is a waste of time and space, at least for me. YMMV. One can only experiment and find what works for one's own personal shooting style.I agree on using Lightroom over Photoshop. I would also recommend using 5 bracket (HDR) exposures to give yourself more dynamic range.
Hey Venom!Literally the first image I have ever done in the program using a .DNG.
I normally don't shoot in it or RAW but I might more.. Stole this from a pano folder where the pano failed due to wind.
View attachment 156220
Full Disclosure, I normally use Snapseed to do my editing for photo's just uses the advanced modes.
Sure retired NH!Dale D, how would your edit compare to just lifting the shadows?
Others might note that the new masking tools in the latest edition of LR Classic mean you probably would not need to go to Photoshop to get this masked edit? Dale, care to comment?
Sure retired NH!Dale D, how would your edit compare to just lifting the shadows?
Others might note that the new masking tools in the latest edition of LR Classic mean you probably would not need to go to Photoshop to get this masked edit? Dale, care to comment?
Sure retired NH!Dale D, how would your edit compare to just lifting the shadows?
Others might note that the new masking tools in the latest edition of LR Classic mean you probably would not need to go to Photoshop to get this masked edit? Dale, care to comment?
I have had Adobe for many, many years. I can afford it and I love it. Don't really want to get into the Adobe discussion for now.If you have an Adobe subscription (or just don't mind spending the extra money), I'd recommend Lightroom over Photoshop for general photo editing. The workflow, especially with raw files, is so much better if you're just doing slider-type adjustments (as opposed to a lot of brush work). And as you've probably noticed, the amount of detail you can save from shadows and highlights in a raw file is so much better and gives you a larger margin of error...some say raw in photography is a crutch, but for drones you just don't have quite the same level of control over the camera that is there in regular photography, so having that margin is really nice.
This a great video the new AI masking tool of Light room and Photo shopDale D, how would your edit compare to just lifting the shadows?
Others might note that the new masking tools in the latest edition of LR Classic mean you probably would not need to go to Photoshop to get this masked edit? Dale, care to comment?
The new AI masking is pretty amazing. Since I don't do portrait photography, the object detection will be most useful to me.This a great video the new AI masking tool of Light room and Photo shop
Dale
Maggior:The new AI masking is pretty amazing. Since I don't do portrait photography, the object detection will be most useful to me.
DaleThe new AI masking is pretty amazing. Since I don't do portrait photography, the object detection will be most useful to me.
So after spending some time with this thread, I decided to take my M3 outside for a hyperlapse sunset. Here is a single frame out-take before and after Adobe Photoshop Masking. In the un-edited shot, the brightness of the sun overpowers the foreground which is grossly under exposed. AFTER the masking, (I developed the sky first), here is what the image looks like. The foreground detail is amazing.Maggior:
I am thrilled that you are using the Masking programs that Adobe is using. I would have used the LINEAR gradient because it is less work than multiple radial gradients. View attachment 156267
Dale
I use linear gradients to adjust a big swath of the image from one of the edges. I use radial gradients to make adjustments that are perhaps in the middle of the photo to get very specific about where I want to tweak. Even subtle tweaks can make a significant difference.Maggior:
I am thrilled that you are using the Masking programs that Adobe is using. I would have used the LINEAR gradient because it is less work than multiple radial gradients. View attachment 156267
Dale
The edited version for sure is better. Amazing what can be recovered from under exposure. Sometimes it can look a bit artificial though. Depends on the look you are going for.So after spending some time with this thread, I decided to take my M3 outside for a hyperlapse sunset. Here is a single frame out-take before and after Adobe Photoshop Masking. In the un-edited shot, the brightness of the sun overpowers the foreground which is grossly under exposed. AFTER the masking, (I developed the sky first), here is what the image looks like. The foreground detail is amazing.
Any question which image you would prefer?
Dale
Dale
I am presently processing the timelapse/hyperlapse sunset using the masking tools that are included in the LRTimelapse software. I will be incorporating it in an upcoming video.The edited version for sure is better. Amazing what can be recovered from under exposure. Sometimes it can look a bit artificial though. Depends on the look you are going for.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.