GyroFlow is superior but not for everyone. You can modify parts of the video, in parts, with more or less effect.I am wondering why many folks think the Avata's built in stabilization is not sufficient? I am mean, sure you can always make things smoother through software, but personally, I don't see the need to use it in most scenarios, not to mention the extra time and hassle factor. Am I missing something?
The reason I am exploring Gyroflow is for the ability to choose the level of "rocksteady". After shooting a scene it may well be that I would like some wild unstabilized action or a minute later a steady look and gryroflow will allow you to make that decision in post. I have not yet really explored it. I'm going to Arizona for a desert drone vacation and trying to grasp it's usefulness so as to not waste time down there. I'm just at the "interested in it" stage. A huge downside for me is the time it takes. On my older 2017 iMac processing a Gyroflow file takes 4x the video shoot time. I'll have a tricked out Macbook Pro when the M2 are announced so that time issue will diminish at least somewhat.I am wondering why many folks think the Avata's built in stabilization is not sufficient? I am mean, sure you can always make things smoother through software, but personally, I don't see the need to use it in most scenarios, not to mention the extra time and hassle factor. Am I missing something?
In the clip in post #2 between 0:30 & 1:40 he goes over some reasons why you might want to apply the stabilization in post....Am I missing something?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.