H hardhat068 Well-Known Member Joined Mar 8, 2017 Messages 59 Reactions 35 Age 51 Dec 23, 2017 #1 To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies. For more detailed information, see our cookies page. Accept third party cookies Reactions: Rokitt69 and Skrems
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies. For more detailed information, see our cookies page. Accept third party cookies
R Rokitt69 Member Joined Oct 31, 2017 Messages 18 Reactions 7 Age 48 Dec 24, 2017 #2 They both look great in my eyes. I'd go for the mavic though. Had connection issues out of my yuneec. Reactions: hardhat068
They both look great in my eyes. I'd go for the mavic though. Had connection issues out of my yuneec.
C Cut.Aussie Well-Known Member Joined Apr 1, 2017 Messages 501 Reactions 207 Age 71 Dec 24, 2017 #3 They both use the same Amberella video processor chip so it’s not surprising the video quality is very similar Reactions: hardhat068
They both use the same Amberella video processor chip so it’s not surprising the video quality is very similar
B BerndM Well-Known Member Joined Jan 8, 2017 Messages 895 Reactions 464 Location Planet Earth Dec 25, 2017 #4 The color on the Yuneec is a bit more saturated, which I like. Just curious...since your were doing a comparison, why not shoot them both in 4K/30? Comparing 4K and 2.7K is not equal. Reactions: MAvic_South_Oz
The color on the Yuneec is a bit more saturated, which I like. Just curious...since your were doing a comparison, why not shoot them both in 4K/30? Comparing 4K and 2.7K is not equal.