After writing, afterthought... this may be in wrong thread... but does touch folding props.
Don’t have a
MA yet (soon!), do have a MP & Spark. For the MP purchased a nice form fit, minimal bulk case. This same design appears to be part of the standard
MA package. These cases do add some bulk, but add protection. The MP “case” fits in a center bike jersey pocket and withdraws much easier than exposed props, arms, stub legs, and gimbal shield (experienced gimbal cover unhooking while withdrawing in backpack).
For the investment, electronic sensitivity, marginally fragile hardware, squeezing a Mavic into pocket, backpack, etc. “bare” would be considered risky for the small benifit in space savings. When you consider the size & transportabilty compared to just a few years ago, exp: Phanton, Typhoon H and where it’ll develope, all impressive. IMO, I’d rather get the smallest protective case and the quietest blades.
The folding blades have a “cool” factor too and I do like the technology of folding blades. Although, folding blades introduce addition balance concerns, both static & dynamic. With the sensitive 3 way gimbal compared to stiffer 2 way Spark gimbal, the possibility introducing a jello effect is greater with smaller props, higher RPM, ND filters & slower shutter, and out of balance props. Folding props are normally further out of balance and much harder to dynamically keep in balance, especially with plastic quick detach lugs & mounts.
The quad & hex platforms are focused toward photography; larger diameter 2 or 3 blades just under tip clearance for max lift, low RPM, ultra wisper quite would be an option I’d like to see released... I’d consider folding tri-props “balanced” an option too.
I would assume DJI’s design goal on
MA was the smallest form factor providing best photography for the platform limitations... and cost. My guess on
MP2 if a larger sensor is included, will be focused on photography more than sport or portability... prop size, diameter of lift, audio dB, vibration, etc.