lets all think for a moment ,of all those people who have lost their homes and lively hoods, in the many burning areas of the UK, due to the unprecedented heat, being experienced today ,as of now there are no reported loss of lives ,in the fires
A bit like Formula 1 crash avoidance, aim for where the crash car/s was/
Possibly, if you have enough protection — including air supply (or can hold your breath). You do not want to breath superheated air.I have no experience of flame fronts but I often wonder, could running through the flame front to the burnt out area be safer than running away from an advanciing flame front? I.e. with 'grass fires' could the flame front be thin enough?
Not really contemplating it, it's just that I thought that if you are caught down wind of a fire your chances of actually out running it down wind must be pretty slim, ditto running cross wind if the flame front is long.t if you're contemplating running through flames you are desperate…
Depending on the wind, quite slim.if you are caught down wind of a fire your chances of actually out running it down wind must be pretty slim
Fuel was pretty sparse, too. Certainly the flames were thinner than the fire I was caught in.The Australian clip (Rock Wallabies) was the one that really brought the running through the flames thinking to the fore, its flame front was quite thin..
@old man mavic Did you see the clip of that Spaniard running from the digger?.......Lucky chap, scarey stuff.
I have no experience of flame fronts but I often wonder, could running through the flame front to the burnt out area be safer than running away from an advanciing flame front? I.e. with 'grass fires' could the flame front be thin enough?
A bit like Formula 1 crash avoidance, aim for where the crashed car/s was/were
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.