2.4g has a taller wavelength, so it deals better with obstacles, such as trees (think forest). But, if you are flying in a wifi congested area, 2.4g signals are more prevalent on home wifi routers. Hopefully someone can post here with some real-world information to help clear this up...
Thanks for the heads up. I'm wondering what the benefits of the "Duel" option would be then?“Real world” it’s pretty cut and dry, 2.4 provides a slower data rate, but can penetrate walls and obstacles...It is much better for further distances. 5.0 is much faster, but can’t penetrate or go as far as 2.4. But like you said, 2.4 is a more common signal and therefore could experience more dropouts. So, really I guess the best of both worlds in a congested area would be 5, with a signal booster.
Thanks for the heads up,“Real world” it’s pretty cut and dry, 2.4 provides a slower data rate, but can penetrate walls and obstacles...It is much better for further distances. 5.0 is much faster, but can’t penetrate or go as far as 2.4. But like you said, 2.4 is a more common signal and therefore could experience more dropouts. So, really I guess the best of both worlds in a congested area would be 5, with a signal booster.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.