I think some of us are on a slightly different page as regards to VLOS. I may be wrong but my take on the rules (here at least) and the slant I was given in my training for the RePL
"Unless otherwise approved, the holder of a ReOC or RePL must also adhere to the following conditions: − the RPA is operated: o by visual line of sight (VLOS) only - close enough to see, maintain orientation and achieve accurate flight and tracking"
means that your aircraft must be close enough that you
must be able do all of these things, not that you
must have your eyes on the aircraft all times.
It's not practical to have your eyes on the bird all the times, or safe for that matter.
During a my average commercial flight I do not have my eyes on the aircraft all the time. I'll be adjusting camera settings, scanning for aircraft if I do not have an observer with me, operating the airband radio if I am flying in controlled airspace (as required by C.A.S.A.), wrangling the ever curious public out of harms way and when I am doing an antenna or tower survey for example and flying between the guy wires or in close proximity I usually am flying by the display. I've even been known in demanding flights to let the aircraft hover (in a suitably safe and low location) and actually close my eyes for 30 seconds to allow eye strain to ease and my eyes to return to normal before continuing. While this is going on it'll still be within VLOS.
I set myself a nominal value on the day based on what aircraft I am flying and the conditions. Nominally I use 300m as my yard stick. On a really perfect day over water flying the Inspire I might stretch that to 500m, under really awful conditions flying the Spark over broken terrain it might be 30m. Whatever is safe on the day I go with, and remember I will have completed a a formalised written "Job Safety Assessment" as required in the regulations before hand so I am committed in writing to be able to justify that decision to C.A.S.A. if it went pear shaped so I take the decision
very seriously.
We have to keep in mind that the rules are there for safety, we have to be focused on the aim of the rules more so than the letter of the rules. That's why they removed hard distance figures.
Is BVLOS safely possible? Yes I believe so with the right equipment and the right situation, the predator pilots seem to do OK from half a world away.. but again they have the right equipment.
Would I fly BVLOS if the rules were different? Again, yes depending on my equipment and the situation. For that matter as an RePL I can get BVLOS clearance if I am prepared to meet certain requirements and equipment standards, I've had it incorporated into my ReOC in preperation. I'm not in the least bit intimidated by it. I've been on the sticks nearly 30 years and back in the day (I'm ashamed of what I am about to admit to as a rational adult lol) I was a full time member of the Australasian champion team for a popular first person shooter for over 5 years. (no not telling but my forums name here has been a staple on gaming forums since 1999, you can web search if you like). That was 8 hours a day 6 days a week. I have a pretty good 3D situational awareness from a 2D screen but it took years to acquire. It's no coincidence that drone pilots for the government when not retired airforce pilots are often retired gamers lol.
The footage linked by Southfork1 is a perfect example. Could I fly that mission? Yes. Would I fly that mission? If the rules allowed it or I was given an exemption to fly it, again Yes.
It was a rural location, obviously below
any possibility of airspace conflict with manned aviation down there in the canyon, although I saw one person at far left of shot just past the 3 minutes point there was no one within 30m of the aircraft. Formal risk rating to people would be 0 or 1, formal risk assessment to airframe woutd be 3 or 4. That won't mean anything to anyone who isn't an Australian RePL but suffice to say it would be permitted on the basis of risk if you were seeking clearance so (and I stress) with the right equipment why not? It'd would be incredibly rewarding and at wost I'd be out an aircraft.
On the other hand I won't fly over a built up area even within VLOS and with approval. Others might, I'm not comfortable with it.
I think given time as technology gains and the public and the government become aware of the realities of R.P.A. possibilities vs risks we're going to be given a conditional set of rules under which BVLOS will be allowed much like night flying is now in the U.S. It won't be allowed everywhere but it will be stipulated in which locations and which airspace and with which equipment and what risk mitigation must be in place.
Until that day arrives however, you'll always find my aircraft within VLOS.
*sigh* another short story, and I even refrained from cutting and pasting the legislation and the risk assessment charts
apologies everyone.
Regards
Ari