Recent content by Aerial Gopher

Are people still asking this question........ Wow. Search...... Oh wait...... this is why the laws are so tight around drones. Just about anyone can fly them, and maybe they shouldn't.

I was gonna do this with a pi3. Just to lazy. Now you can set up a hotspot for all them onlookers can connect and watch your stream instead of thier Stanky breath as they look over your shoulder like they wanna nibble on your ear......

How much was your video delayed with the slow samsung tablet? Mine no longer works for video, but it used to with a nasty delay in video.

Well... I wonder why this Mavic was still flying if you can mess it up within 200feet of some big fancy power lines... Or Antenna tower ? Meh..... easy flying...

Just get a 4k TV, cheaper and if you are not gaming you wont be able to tell, but test it out first for pixel clipping, and clarity. Some 55 inch samsung TVs the 6900 series are only 699 bux cnd and si is the 50 inch 7100 series samsung.

I wish Today I received the ‘Screw’ I need and ‘Priority’ consideration too!!!! but unlikey so i will continue to watch the instructional videos. :-P

If you look at that link I gave you before, the where to fly your drone, there is this section: Order a “No drone zone” sign “No drone zone” signs are available in various formats for airport, aerodrome, heliport and seaplane base authorities to post around the boundaries of their properties...

READ THE ARTICLE! ONLY MENTION NATIONAL PARKS with WARNINGS Postmedia reported that 26 warnings were issued to drone operators in Banff National Park. According to the park's External Relations Manager, Judy Glowinski, "all of them were unaware of the rules and regulations regarding drone use...

ABSOLUTLEY 100000000000 % Sure Post media IS NOT the authority. Nor is a Drone Insurance company that has an incentive to scare people to get insurance. Authoritative Source, Alberta Government. PROVINCIAL PARKS ACT http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Acts/P35.pdf On Page 2 Interpretation...

Provincial parks are not included in that. National parks are however.

Registration would be on the tail boom or engine cowling. On the engine cowling there looks to be writing on it, but they would never be allowed to put black on grey, it would not be contrasted enough. So the blurred darker grey cannot be the registration

Yes. They are opposite. Nothing adds up here. The blade on the right side of the image is correct orientation, and so is the front one. But the left side of image, (right side of aircraft) is the wrong way, well by bell design it is wrong but the video shows this rotor assembly spring the...

Ok so I do see some writing in this image, on the engine cowling cover. There is black writing on the grey. But I still cant believe this helicopter can fly with the blades spinning the wrong way. The trim tab on the blade is perfectly seen when they show how the sweep of the blade is there...

Yes, one very good reason. Views. That generates ad revenue. The other guy posts a video analyzing it, saying g it's real, when everyone can see its faked and that generates discussion and comments on youtube. This is viewer engagement, generates even more ad revenue. Motive Clear now?

I didn't read all posts because this is so pathetic people actually discuss this. Few points if they have not been pointed out before No registration on air craft. Bell = north American, = counter clockwise rotor head. Yet this one is clockwise. Take a look at the rotor head how the blades...