Recent content by anotherlab

You don't know if he has been getting the permits or not. You can get them. It's not easy and has restrictions. The permit process requires for you to have the Part 107, have insurance, post notices in the area before the flight, etc. It covers one specific day with a detailed plan of the...

Anything written for Python 3.9 or 3.10 should run without any issues with the latest version of 3.x.

How do you know that it was almost-definitely illegal? If you have $150 for the application fee and the insurance, you can apply to fly within the city. You request up to 5 flight locations per permit.

It's more of counter-drone technology and practices.

If you want to skip the tweet from Ice Barbie, the actual press release can be read here. I wonder how much of the $115 million allocated for this will end up at the Strategy Group? It wouldn't be the first time that happened.

I responded to the survey. It was fine. If it helps the cause, so be it. If the Deep State were coming after me, they wouldn't waste time on a survey.

You missed the point. It doesn't matter what the FAA does as long as the FCC does not certify new DJI drones. But I updated my avatar, so I'll be protected.

It doesn't matter. FAA registration is about airspace safety and accountability, not communications compliance. It's not their circus, those are not their monkeys.

Stefanik started as a typical mainstream congressperson. Prior to Trump, she was considered to be a moderate to conservative and was willing to cross party lines to get stuff done. She decided the way to get ahead was to hitch herself to Trump and went all in. She has learned that relationships...

No, this changes nothing.

Not even then.

Sony was making a cinematic drone, but pulled the plug on it last year because it couldn't compete with DJI. With the effective elimination of DJI from the US market, they may reconsider bringing it back. Panasonic worked with drone companies to adapt their camera technology to work on drone...

The title of this post is misleading. The FCC did not roll back the ban on licensing new drones from foreign countries. The FCC had previously exempted a small list of drone vendors. The article linked by the OP referred to the Commerce Department, not the FCC.

That's the point. It's not applicable. The quote/unquote reason for blocking foreign drones was over vague and unproven security concerns. No one has ever accused Toyota of sending back data from cars on the road to Japan that could be used against the US. Huawei was added to the Entity List...