Cool 360, but why did you need an ND64 for a series of stitched still photographs? Surely 1/8000 of a second would have been fast enough to get a proper exposure at f/1.7. For panos, all the ND64 does is raise the ISO, which is never a good thing.
ice
It turned out perfectly! That is a good thing!Cool 360, but why did you need an ND64 for a series of stitched still photographs? Surely 1/8000 of a second would have been fast enough to get a proper exposure at f/1.7. For panos, all the ND64 does is raise the ISO, which is never a good thing.
Indeed. However, what was your thinking in using any ND filter for a 360° pano?It turned out perfectly! That is a good thing!
This is enough reason to put you on "ignore" have a good life!Indeed. However, what was your thinking in using any ND filter for a 360° pano?
It's a reasonable question. What's offensive? I'm also wondering what benefits you see from using an ND64 filter for the shots.This is enough reason to put you on "ignore" have a good life!
I live in Arizona, where we have full sunlight for 365 days a year. I find the use of filters improves my pictures. How someone feels I should take my photos is not why I am here. He can take his pictures any way he chooses!It's a reasonable question. What's offensive? I'm also wondering what benefits you see from using an ND64 filter for the shots.
You lose lol. go someplace else if all you want is praise lmao.I live in Arizona, where we have full sunlight for 365 days a year. I find the use of filters improves my pictures. How someone feels I should take my photos is not why I am here. He can take his pictures any way he chooses!
Absolutely!! It turned out great. BEAUTIFUL area!!! Suggestions for future pictures are one thing, unasked for criticism is another altogether.I live in Arizona, where we have full sunlight for 365 days a year. I find the use of filters improves my pictures. How someone feels I should take my photos is not why I am here. He can take his pictures any way he chooses!
Cool 360, but why did you need an ND64 for a series of stitched still photographs?
After I responded “it turned out fine”Wow. That looks like a compliment and a simple question to me. How is it seen as a criticism and harassment?
It is a very nice panorama of a very pretty place, but I can't help but wonder what the reaction would be if someone mentioned the stitching discontinuities in the highway or innocently asked what shutter speed the auto-exposure system chose.
I'm still interested in why anyone would use any ND filter for a still camera shot that you aren't deliberately trying to blur sharpness on, or increase the noise in. It's a serious question. The 1/8000 of a second is plenty fast enough, even for AZ sun, and reducing that by 6 stops can only have an adverse effect upon your panorama. It certainly won't improve it. But maybe you know something I don't. Please share.After I responded “it turned out fine”
That should have been the end of it.
Your not the first person to put him on the ignore list.This is enough reason to put you on "ignore" have a good life!
HaHa!Your not the first person to put him on the ignore list.
No one is harassing you.I wasn't asking for praise. I don't need to be harassed because I don't want to manually set up my camera!
Where was the criticism in asking a question? He included the ND64 in the description, as though it was relevant and important to creating the shared pano, appreciated by all. I still haven't heard anything about how the ND64 did anything to improve the pano. I was hoping to learn from him!Absolutely!! It turned out great. BEAUTIFUL area!!! Suggestions for future pictures are one thing, unasked for criticism is another altogether.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.